Comments for Wee Choo Keong |
- Comment on Genuine collaboration needs no share “SUAP”! by Mohamadon Abdullah
- Comment on The highhandedness of the TRIO & their inaction over RM31 million debt against AAX by X-MAS
- Comment on Complaints for DBKL by cheehon
- Comment on Genuine collaboration needs no share “SUAP”! by Mohamadon Abdullah
- Comment on The highhandedness of the TRIO & their inaction over RM31 million debt against AAX by fed-up
- Comment on Is Shane Nollan “ripping off” the Government? by panglima
- Comment on Is Shane Nollan “ripping off” the Government? by panglima
- Comment on Genuine collaboration needs no share “SUAP”! by Anonymous
- Comment on The highhandedness of the TRIO & their inaction over RM31 million debt against AAX by Anonymous
- Comment on The highhandedness of the TRIO & their inaction over RM31 million debt against AAX by Recalcitrant
Comment on Genuine collaboration needs no share “SUAP”! by Mohamadon Abdullah Posted: 04 May 2012 08:51 AM PDT The MAS-AA share swap was abandoned…..but the saga is not over yet. It is just a case of “cerai talak satu” with the proposed establishment of a Joint Venture Company. |
Posted: 04 May 2012 06:58 AM PDT That was IJ’s great work and someone has the audacity to ask PM for him to come back to MAS |
Comment on Complaints for DBKL by cheehon Posted: 04 May 2012 05:39 AM PDT Hi YB and Encik Yaacob, The construction of PV2 became quiet for few days after help from Encik Yaacob, thank you very much. However the habit of working late and making noise came back today. Time now is 8:35 and I still hear those working dumping their construction waste and making a lot of noise. I have made a complaint on DBKL website and the ticket number is 28493.050909, but when I check back on DBKL website, it gives me error saying record not found. Please help on this matter. |
Comment on Genuine collaboration needs no share “SUAP”! by Mohamadon Abdullah Posted: 04 May 2012 03:21 AM PDT Why is there a need to form a Joint Venture Company for collaboration, when a simple MoU will just do. Setting up a JV Company on 50%-50% basis, to provide say Engineering Services, Simulator Training, Ground Services etc. would mean that MAS will just concentrate on Flight Operations and other ancilliary services will be sourced out (which will be costly in the long run). As an example, Flight Simulators are used for Pilot Training. The MAS Flight Simulators are not generic Flight Simulators but built to be consistent with MAS aircrafts cokpit configurations. The Flight Simulators are not only used for the manadtory bi-annual base checks and aircraft type ratings but also for pilot training to enhance their operating skills and also for the training of ground engineering personnel. If the Simulator Training is to be outsourced, chances are, focus will only be on bi-annual base checks and aircraft type ratings, to save cost, not to mention that the Simulator would be a generic one and not consistent with the aircaft cockpit configurations, which will lead having to introduce “differences’ training modules using actual aeroplnes, which means added cost. Enhancig pilots operating skills would be at the minimum, because it would be costly. With MAS owned Flight Simulators, MAS Pilots will get prime time on simulators hours anytime and everytime. I wonder what the expatriate so called “Safety Advisor” has to say from the Flight Safety point of view. Yes, there are some areas of synergies, but specific needs of MAS operations must be paramount. Due considerations of the many operational factors must be given. Be wary of the ‘ice berg” theory.About one hundred years ago the Cpatain of the Titanic only saw the tip of the ice berg but did not see what lies beneah the water level. I am sure we should be able to learn from this experience. MAS should regroup, stop leakages, manage cost, maintain staff discipline etc. Concentrate on generating revenue not only from passenger/cargo carriage. A simplistic example, Hotels do not earn revenue from the sales of rooms only but from other revenue streams such as F&B, Hall Rentals, Business Centre etc. |
Posted: 04 May 2012 02:13 AM PDT Anon 1:43 |
Comment on Is Shane Nollan “ripping off” the Government? by panglima Posted: 04 May 2012 01:51 AM PDT For the sake of MAS nad the country please bring back TS Aziz Rahman. He should replace the Chairman and the CON-SULTANts!!! |
Comment on Is Shane Nollan “ripping off” the Government? by panglima Posted: 04 May 2012 01:46 AM PDT Memang sah Danny ni penderhaka Negara. Tapi begitu dasyatnya sabotage yg beliau telah lakukan tak memadai kalau kita pecat dia begitu saja, tapi lebih sesuai dia dihukum tembak!!! |
Comment on Genuine collaboration needs no share “SUAP”! by Anonymous Posted: 04 May 2012 12:36 AM PDT Xyah layan Jamie tu..pariah dh bayar dia..may b fly AA for free once a year..you’re so damn cheap Jamie! |
Posted: 03 May 2012 10:43 PM PDT Last week Qantas announced retrenchment, today Lufthansa announced retrenchment, MAS bila lagi? |
Posted: 03 May 2012 10:18 PM PDT Tony, Tony, Tony. So the share swap is cancelled due to a few SELFISH staff is it? Selfish to whom? I thought that by uplifting 35,000 of your cheapskate passengers for a song, we could at least have got a big THANK YOU from you? Or maybe you think we should have uplifted the 35,000 for FREE then we will not be termed “selfish”? AJ,AJ,AJ – Tony has made an anouncement about ther NAC. What have you got to say? Or are you going to ask Planeconsult first what you should think and then ask the other consultant CHIMERA (who handles internal strategic comms and media etc etc for RM420,000) how to say it? For RM420,000 they will advise you to send out another statement at midnight on a Friday!! |
You are subscribed to email updates from Comments for Wee Choo Keong To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
Tiada ulasan:
Catat Ulasan