Chong Chieng Jen's Blog

Posted by Admin Direktori Blog | Posted on 3:49 PG

Chong Chieng Jen's Blog

Chong Poses 5 Questions on the Pan Borneo Highway Contract to BN reps

Posted: 17 Apr 2015 05:44 PM PDT

The Sarawak BN elected representatives, the likes of Abdullah Saidol (ADUN for SEMOP), Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah (Assistant Minister) and Michael Manyin have totally evaded my queries on the award of Pan Borneo Highway project to Lebuhraya Borneo Utara Sdn Bhd (LBU) and tried to give a racial twist to my critics on the award of the said project to LBU.
In their statements today, the 3 of them seem to have either purposely avoided answering my queries or just could not understand the issues.
As such, for their clarity, I will put my questions in words that are easier for them to understand. The 5 questions for the 3 BN leaders to answer are as follows:
1. While the Government claims to help Sarawak contractors, why is the Board of Directors of the appointed Main Contractor, LBU, controlled by West Malaysians (4 out of 7 of the directors are West Malaysians)?
2. While the Government claims to help Bumiputra, why is there not a single Dayak in the Board of Directors nor Shareholdings of LBU or its holding companies? Dayaks are also Bumiputra, why are they left out?
On this question, I would like to remind Abdu Karim that by raising this issue, I am not importing the so-called West Malaysian racial politics into Sarawak. It is the act of the Federal Government to award the contract to a single-race company that is importing the West Malaysian racial policy into Sarawak. I am merely stating a fact so that such racial policy can be rectified.
3. While Adenan is preaching integrity and transparency and that the Sarawak cabinet ministers have signed the so-called "Integrity Pledges", why is a contract worth more than RM10 billion awarded without open tender process?
4. While LBU has only been registered in 2011 and zero track record in construction and any trading activity, why was LBU appointed as the Main Contractor for the Pan Borneo Highway project? Is the government intending to continue with the "Ali Baba" contractor modus operandi in the implementation of its projects?
5. While the government is talking about cutting-costs, why create an Ali Baba middleman? Would it not make better sense for the Government to break down the whole stretch of Pan Borneo Highway into 20 – 30 smaller contracts, carry out open-tender processes and award the contracts directly to the ones doing the work, rather than going through LBU who will get the lion share of commission / profit, leaving the actual contractors smaller budgets to do the job?
Michael Manyin was saying that the works for the projects will not be dominated by one single race. He is either playing ignorant or just pure ignorant. The whole contract has already been awarded to LBU. It is now up to LBU to decide who will be the sub-contractors.
It is well-known in the industry that Main Contractor will take between 10% - 20% of the money and leaving the balance for the sub-contractors who actually do the job. As the Minister in-charge of public works, it would be a joke if Michael Manyin is not aware of this improper practice which has become a norm in public construction works for the Government.
I hope the 3 BN elected representatives can understand and reply to my 5 questions posed above and be accountable to the people of Sarawak.
Chong Chieng Jen
MP for Bandar Kuching
ADUN for Kota Sentosa


Posted: 17 Apr 2015 05:42 PM PDT

1. 既然国阵政府表示将帮助砂州承包商,为何政府委任一个由西马人控制的公司为承建泛婆大道的承包商,Lebuhraya Borneo Utara有限公司(LBU)? (这间公司的董事局有7人,其中4人士西马人)
2. 既然政府自称要协助土著,为何LBU这间公司的董事,其母公司的董事和股东,连一位达雅人也没有? 达雅人也是土著。
张氏强调,他提出这问题,并非如阿都卡林所指责的把西马种族政治带进砂州。 其实,当政府委任一间清一色马来人的公司(而且是完全没有建筑背景的公司)承建价值超过100亿令吉的泛婆大道工程,这已是将西马的种族主义政策引进砂州了。 张氏只是道出这事实,以便这种种族主义政策得以纠正。
3. 既然阿德南不断强调廉政和透明施政,砂州内阁成员甚至签署"廉政宣言",为何这价值超过100亿令吉的工程,在没有经过任何公开招标的程序,就批给了一间公司?
4. 既然LBU有限公司只是于2011年注册,而又没有任何建筑记录和商业活动,为何政府委任LBU有限公司为泛婆大道的承包商? 难道政府还是要持续"阿里巴巴"进行政府工程的运作模式?
5. 既然政府要节省资金,为何又再制造出一个"阿里巴巴"的中间人?与其将全部的工程批给一间公司再由这间公司转批给二手承包商,为何政府不将全程的泛婆大道工程分为20 – 30 段,分发出去,由20 – 30 不同的承包商直接承包工程,不需经过一个中间人的剥削?
"身为负责工程局的砂州部长,难道迈克马因不知道,目前建筑业的惯例,一手承包商将抽取10% – 20%工程的拨款数字,剩余的款项才付给真正承建工程的二手承包商。 若有三手承包商 ,这层层剥削的情况将更糟糕。"


Posted by Admin Direktori Blog | Posted on 1:33 PTG


In view of the rattling evidence in Court, will the Education Ministry conduct an inquiry for possible actions against the Examinations Syndicate officials?

Posted: 16 Apr 2015 05:01 AM PDT


Posted by Admin Direktori Blog | Posted on 1:43 PTG


Set up a bipartisan parliamentary select committee to study the amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code

Posted: 14 Apr 2015 07:17 AM PDT

Chong Chieng Jen's Blog

Posted by Admin Direktori Blog | Posted on 3:37 PG

Chong Chieng Jen's Blog

Do not equate RM2.1 billion contracts awarded by Petronas with 20% oil and gas royalty

Posted: 11 Apr 2015 06:05 PM PDT

Adenan seems to be contented with the so-called intended awards of RM2.1 billion worth of contracts by PETRONAS to Sarawak contractors, thereby diverting the attention of the people from the initial demand for 20% oil and gas royalty for Sarawak.
Last year, in the Sarawak DUN sitting, the State Legislature unanimously passed the resolution to demand for 20% oil and gas royalty for Sarawak.
Till this day, almost a year has passed and yet it seems that the demand has hit brick-wall.
Despite the failure on the part of Sarawak government under the leadership of Adenan to execute the resolution of the Sarawak DUN, Adenan seems to be happy and contented with the award of contracts worth RM2.1 billion to Sarawak contractors.
The 20% oil and gas royalty is a far cry from the RM2.1 billion worth of contracts awarded in many ways, namely:
1. According to the 2015 Sarawak State Budget's estimates, the 5% oil and gas royalty will give Sarawak a revenue of RM1.83 billion. Therefore, 20% oil and gas royalty will give Sarawak an additional RM5.49 billion. This is 2.5 times the RM2.1 billion mentioned.
2. "Contracts worth RM2.1 billion to Sarawak contractors" means that Sarawak contractors have to come out with RM2.1 billion worth of material and work to earn that RM2.1 billion. This is totally different from the outright RM5.49 billion cash payment as oil and gas royalty.
3. Out of the RM2.1 billion worth of contract, I am sure a very substantial portion will be paid to import materials from suppliers who are not Sarawakians or to engage consultants who are not Sarawakian. Therefore, not the whole of the RM2.1 billion will be circulating in the Sarawak economy.
4. The contracts worth RM2.1 billion will benefits the local contractors who are awarded with the contracts. Its impact on the general public in Sarawak is limited. On the other hand, the RM5.49 billion royalty payment can be used by the Government to benefit all Sarawakian, especially the poor.
5. Even if all the contracts worth RM2.1 billion were to be awarded this year, they will definitely take more than a year to complete all. Therefore, it will not be RM2.1 billion worth of contract a year. The amount will be spread over a few years. On the other hand, if the 20% oil and gas royalty were to be given to Sarawak, it would mean an additional RM5.49 billion a year.
Given the above 5 points, Adenan should not try to use the RM2.1 billion worth of contracts to cover-up his failure to obtain 20% oil and gas royalty from PUTRAJAYA. Such failure to obtain the 20% oil and gas royalty from PUTRAJAYA shows the disrespect on the part of the Federal Government towards Sarawak's rights.
It further proves that Sarawak BN is just an insignificant appendage to the Federal BN and that Sarawak BN cannot make any important decision without the nod from the Federal BN.
In the coming DUN sitting, I will suggest some ways whereby the Sarawak Government can compel the Federal Government to give in to the demand of 20% oil and gas royalty, PROVIDED THAT the Sarawak Government must have the political will and resolve that it is not a subordinate or a colony to the Federal Government.
Chong Chieng Jen
DAP Sarawak Chairman
MP for Bandar Kuching
ADUN for Kota Sentosa


Posted: 11 Apr 2015 06:03 PM PDT

1. 根据砂州政府2015年的财政预算案,砂州政府将从5%的开采税获得约18.3亿令吉的收入。若开采税增至20%,州政府将得到额外的54.9亿令吉。 这是21亿令吉的2.5倍。
2. 价值21亿令吉的工程意味着砂州承包商必须付出价值21亿令吉的物质和工作,才可赚取这21亿令吉工程合约的钱。 相比之下,20%开采税的额外54.9亿令吉,是直接的付款予州政府,砂州承包商或公司,甚至砂州政府什么都不需做,就可收到这笔54.9亿令吉的钱了。
3. 至于这价值21亿令吉的工程,我相信,有一大部分将用在进口机器或工程原料及聘雇外籍专才。 因此,这21亿令吉将不会全部留在砂州的经济体之内。
4. 无可否认,价值21亿令吉的工程将惠及一些砂州承包商,但它对全民的效应仍是有限。 相比额外54.9亿令吉的开采税,这54.9亿令吉是政府直接的收入,可用在各个领域的拨款,用以惠及全民,尤其是中下阶级的人民。
5. 这价值21亿令吉的工程,肯定不是每年的,因为就算全部价值21亿令吉的工程可在1年的时间之内批完,也不可能全部都能在1年的时间之内完成。 因此,这价值21亿令吉的工程,等到承包商们真正收足这21亿令吉的钱,最快也要2 – 3年的时间。 相比54.9亿令吉额外开采税的税收,却是每一年的政府收入。
有鉴于以上5个大不同,张健仁敦促阿迪南,不要一直以"价值21亿令吉工程"自我陶醉,来掩饰20%开采税诉求的失败。 更何况,这20%开采税的诉求,是砂州议会一致的议决案,是立法机关给予行政机构(砂州内阁)的任务。 阿迪南的内阁无法履行这项任务,是行政机构的失责。
"同时,这项任务的失败,也显示出砂国阵毕竟只是全国国阵的一个附属体,没有自主决定重要议题的权力。 在联邦国阵完全漠视和不尊重砂州议会决定的当儿,砂国阵只能逆来顺受,屈居人下。"
张健仁表示,他将在来届州议会(21/4/2015开始至29/4/2015)提出一些建议,如何让联邦政府就范,俯顺砂州政府的诉求。 但是先决条件就是,砂州国阵必须要有一个坚强的政治意愿,不要自贬为联邦的附属体或殖民地。


Posted: 10 Apr 2015 06:18 PM PDT



张氏昨日在国会下议院引述1962年砂州议会当时针对砂拉越参组马来西亚动议,众多议员们的辩论。 当时许多议员们都强调,要参组马来西亚,砂拉越必须拥有退出马来西亚的权力。

这是为了保障,将来若马来西亚并非如承诺般的好,砂州没有得到应得的利益,我们的下一代有权力退出马来西亚。 这是对砂州人民最重要的保障。

张氏也指出,当时参组马来西亚委员会主席有讲过: "任何自愿参组一个联邦的国家,都拥有退出该联邦的权力,因此,这项权力不需要明文写在宪法里。"










‘Treat Sarawak equally to address secession notions’

Posted: 10 Apr 2015 06:06 PM PDT

Sarawak DAP says the only way to reduce secession calls in Sabah and Sarawak is to address inequality between East and West Malaysia.

Amending the Sedition Act and criminalising Sarawakians and Sabahans who call for referendum on secession is plain regrettable, says Sarawak DAP chief Chong Chieng Jen.

Using the Act to suppress the secession movement, he adds, is the wrong way to do it, "because for every action, there is a reaction, and for every suppression, there is a counter action".

"In order words they will fight back," says the Bandar Kuching MP, who spoke up during the debate on Sedition Act amendments in Parliament.

Chong told reporters today that while he might not support the movement for secession, he would defend their right to demand for a referendum.

For the past three years, the calls for secession have become louder in both Sabah and Sarawak, so much so that the Federal Government has to introduce the amendment to the Sedition Act to criminalise any call for secession.

The Sedition (Amendment) Bill 2015 was passed by Parliament at 2.30am on Friday.

Sabah and S'wak 'neglected'

Chong said the federal government must also address the violation of the spirit of the Malaysia Agreement, which protects the rights of Sarawak and Sabah.

The Agreement was to bring development in Sabah and Sarawak on par with development in Malaya, but the two states had been mistreated and neglected, he alleged.

Chong cited a list of violation of the rights of Sarawak by the federal. They include the hudud issue, sending of 4,000 teachers to rural Sabah and Sarawak to carry out an Islamisation agenda, and the refusal to respect the request by the state for the gas and oil royalty increase.

Sarawak, he said, was very concerned over the Islamisation agenda as Malaysia was formed not to be an Islamic state.

"These are the causes of strong sentiments for the people Sabah and Sarawak to call for secession.

"The right thing for the government to do is to address the inequality of treatment and respect the rights of the people of Sabah and Sarawak.

"In this way, the government will reduce the sentiments to call for secession," he stressed.

on MalaysiaKini(Apr 11, 2015)

Chong Chieng Jen's Blog

Posted by Admin Direktori Blog | Posted on 3:28 PG

Chong Chieng Jen's Blog

Impian Education Camp

Posted: 07 Apr 2015 06:01 PM PDT

"Inspiring Lives Through Education"
We are recruiting VOLUNTEERS!
Come join us in our Impian Education Camp as a volunteer this coming May in Sarawak! 

There will be six-day education camp happening in Kpg Bunuk. Our aim is to inculcate a love of reading in children and to promote Science and Math literacy through our specially-designed programme modules. There will also be lots of fun games and sports activities.

Volunteers will help facilitate the camp sessions as well as experiencing the local culture by staying with a host family.

Your expenses will include airfare (if applicable) to Kuching Airport and a contribution fee of RM160 that includes your return ground transfer, food, accommodation as well as insurance.

Applications must reach us by 19 April 2015. For more information, please email:

* If you are not able to join us this time, don't worry! There are many more education camps and projects lined up this year in both Sabah and Sarawak.

Register as a volunteer with us for future updates at:


Posted by Admin Direktori Blog | Posted on 1:02 PTG


Time for tough actions against culprits of excesses, abuses, wastage and leakages

Posted: 07 Apr 2015 07:01 AM PDT

Chong Chieng Jen's Blog

Posted by Admin Direktori Blog | Posted on 3:47 PG

Chong Chieng Jen's Blog

Sedition Act amendment

Posted: 07 Apr 2015 01:03 AM PDT

Barisan Nasional today tabled in Parliament the Sedition Act (Amendment) Bill which, among others, provides that any talk of a State seceding from Malaysia is seditious.

This is a travesty to the terms in the formation of Malaysia.

It was once argued in the Sarawak Council before we agreed to form Malaysia that the right to secede is an implied condition for the Malaysia Agreement.

Now such right is criminalised by the Federal Parliament.
What is even worst is that once you are charged under the amended Act, there is no right to be bailed, you stay in lockup/jail until the whole case is over.


Posted: 07 Apr 2015 12:59 AM PDT

(古晋7日讯) 古晋市国会议员兼哥打圣淘沙州议员张健仁大力谴责国阵政府违反马来西亚合约和建国契约。




"当时,其中一位参组马来西亚委员会成员表示,任何合作的合约都涵盖分开的条约。 因此,虽然在马来西亚合约中并没有明文规定参组之后砂拉越还可以退出马来西亚,但这权力是默示条件,不必明文写着合约内。"




Posted by Admin Direktori Blog | Posted on 1:13 PTG


Indian icons lend weight to 'Save Ashram' protest

Posted: 05 Apr 2015 07:03 PM PDT

Chong Chieng Jen's Blog

Posted by Admin Direktori Blog | Posted on 3:21 PG

Chong Chieng Jen's Blog

张健仁动议修法 原住民统称达雅族

Posted: 05 Apr 2015 09:32 PM PDT

张健仁今日召开新闻发布会,在文告中表示,他是援引砂州州议会常规第45条提呈议员私人法案动议。该动议通知书重点在于寻求议会的批准,修改现有的《 2005年砂拉越阐释法》。
张健仁指出,现有的《砂拉越阐释法》将砂拉越原住民分为23个民族,即Bidayuhs or Land Dayaks, Bukitans, Bisayahs, Dusuns, Ibans or Sea Dayaks, Kadayans, Kelabits, Kayans, Kenyahs (including Sabups and Sipengs), Kajangs (including Sekapans, Kejamans, Lahanans,Punans, Tanjongs and Kanowits), Lugats, Lisums, Malays, Melanaus, Muruts or Lun Bawangs, Penans, Sians, Tagals, Tabuns, Ukits。
张健仁指出,行动党的这项动议,是迎合最近许多达雅族的非政府组织所做出的议决和公布,即在政府部门表格里的种族归类方面,应该取消之前的"其他(dan lain-lain)"或阿迪南所建议的"土著(Bumiputra)",而由"达雅族"来取代。

张健仁:免人才外流 砂应速承认统考文凭

Posted: 05 Apr 2015 09:31 PM PDT


Chong proposes amending ‘Dayaks’ to accord it legal standing

Posted: 04 Apr 2015 09:36 PM PDT

KUCHING: Kota Sentosa assemblyman Chong Chieng Jen is proposing to amend at the next State Legislative Assembly sitting the interpretation of the word 'Dayaks' and accord the legal standing to encompass all  indigenous groups in Sarawak except the Malays.

He said this was crucial in view of the intense discontentment among indigenous people in Sarawak for being referred to as 'lain-lain' (others) in official government forms.

Chong, who is also Bandar Kuching MP, told a media conference at the DAP office here yesterday that he had sent a notice of motion for leave to introduce a Private Member's Bill with regards to the matter in the April 21-29 State Legislative Assembly sitting.

"My notice of motion for leave to introduce a Private Member's Bill entitled 'Sarawak Interpretation Ordinance (Amendment) Bill, 2015' has been faxed and sent to the DUN secretary today (yesterday) for further action," he said.

He explained that under the proposed bill races which were now considered indigenous to Sarawak and natives within the meaning of the ordinance should only be divided into two races, namely Dayaks and Malays.

"Under the proposed Sarawak Interpretation Ordinance (Amendment) Bill 2015 the word Dayaks shall include Bidayuhs (Land Dayaks), Bukitans, Berawans, Bisayahs, Dusuns, Ibans (Sea Dayaks), Kedayans, Kelabits, Kayans, Kenyahs (including Sabups and Sipengs), Kajangs (including Sekapans, Kejamans, Lahanans, Punans, Tanjongs and Kanowits), Lakiputs, Lugats, Lisums, Melanaus (originally spelt as Melanos), Muruts or Lun Bawangs, Penans, Sians, Tagals, Tabuns, Terings, Ukits and any admixture of these sub-ethnic groups with each other," he added.

He said it was the wishes of the large majority of the natives of Sarawak to be unified as one race called 'Dayaks' and that the term 'Dayaks' be accorded the legal standing of the word to encompass all the different indigenous groups in Sarawak with the exception of Malays.

Chong said it was his hope that the proposed Bill would be passed by the house although it might be 'hijacked' or 'adopted' by BN members or ministers like in the past.

"Well, if they want to make some amendments to the bill and make it theirs it is okay with me for as long as the gist of it must still be there," he said.

on BorneoPost(5/4/2015)

张健仁:未列零税率商品 官员不“认识”哥罗面?

Posted: 03 Apr 2015 09:29 PM PDT


The shortage of anaesthetist in the Heart Specialist Centre in the Sarawak General Hospital

Posted: 31 Mar 2015 09:43 PM PDT

Yesterday, in Parliament, I raised the issue of the shortage of anaesthetist in the Heart Specialist Centre in the Sarawak General Hospital.
Few years ago, the said heart specialist centre had only one cardiothoracic surgeon to carry out open heart surgery. As a result, patients who requires to undergo open heart surgery had to wait for 6 – 9 months before surgery could be done on them. Some even died before the surgery was conducted.
After I raised the matter in Parliament, finally two cardiothoracic surgeons were transferred to the Sarawak Heart Specialist Centre. The situation improved and patients needed not to wait in queue for months to have their open heart surgeries.
However, since sometime middle of last year, the said Specialist Centre has only one anaesthetist, as a result of which, though there are 3 cardiothoracic surgeons, at any one time, only one open heart surgery can be conducted. This is because for all open heart surgeries, an anaesthetist must be present throughout the surgeries.
Therefore, the 2 cardiothoracic surgeons are rendered helplessly redundant due to the lack of anaesthetist. They can only sit around helplessly while the queue of patients waiting for open heart surgery grows longer and longer. It is surely not their fault but the bad planning and neglect on the part of the Health Ministry.
Now, the problem is back to the time when there was only one cardiothoracic surgeon. Patients have to wait for 6 – 9 months before their turns for the operation.
This is a totally waste of human resources. The Health Ministry is wasting the time and talent of the extra 2 cardiothoracic surgeons and also doing a disservice to the patients.
I urge the ministry to quickly resolve the problem by sending sufficient anaesthetists to the said Specialist Hospital
In his winding-up, the deputy Health Minister acknowledged the short-coming and promised to resolve the matter as soon as possible.
Chong Chieng Jen
Member of Parliament for Bandar Kuching
ADUN for Kota Sentosa


Posted: 31 Mar 2015 09:41 PM PDT

张氏说,在三年前,当时的古晋心脏专科医院只有一位心脏手术专科医生(cardiothoracic surgeon),进行开心手术(open heart surgery)。当时,他在国会数次提出这问题,最后,卫生部终于派了多两位心脏手术专科医生。解决了需要开心手术病人排长龙的困境。
"有3位心脏手术专科医生但只有一位麻醉师的情况,简直就是人力资源的浪费,因为单一时间只可以有一位心脏手术专科医生动手术,其他两位被逼闲着。最终,需要开心手术的病人也被逼排长龙,需要等6 – 9 个月才可轮到他们。"


Posted: 30 Mar 2015 09:48 PM PDT

张氏指出,如果答案是"会尽力协助伊党",这对砂拉越人民不利,因为这将壮大伊党在砂州的实力,也是间接的在协助推行伊刑法。 如果答案是"不会",那既然大选时不彼此协助,那又何必要粉饰为一个团结的阵线?

I call upon PKR Sarawak to severe its tie with PAS Sarawak so that we, DAP Sarawak and PKR Sarawak can work together for the betterment of Sarawak.

Posted: 30 Mar 2015 09:47 PM PDT

I call upon PKR Sarawak to severe its tie with PAS Sarawak so that we, DAP Sarawak and PKR Sarawak can work together for the betterment of Sarawak.
The Kelantan hudud law episode and the subsequent events that unfold have clearly shown that the political ideals and agenda of PAS does not fit into our Sarawak society.
In fact, few months before we DAP Sarawak decided to quit from Pakatan Rakyat (PR) Sarawak, I have requested PAS Sarawakto make a resolution and statement that hudud law is not suitable for Sarawak and that PAS Sarawak will not pursue the implementation of hudud law in Sarawak.
Sad to say, myrequest was turned down by PAS, indicating clearly that the implementation of hudud law is also the political agenda of PAS Sarawak.
We all know that the implementation ofhudud law will do no good to the State of Sarawak. Therefore, there is no reason for us in Sarawak to continue cooperating with PAS who has made clear about their hudud agenda.
The issue may be more complicated in West Malaysia where PAS, especially the progressive faction of PAS, has an important role to play to counter the dominance of UMNO in the rural areas. This is not the case in Sarawak where there is no UMNO.
My Question to PKR Sarawak:
Knowing the true agenda of PAS, is PKR going to help PAS win seats in the coming State elections so that Sarawak DUN will have some PAS elected representatives?
If the answer is "YES", then PKR will be doing a disservice to Sarawak by contributing to the growth of PAS in Sarawak thereby helping indirectly the hudud agenda in Sarawak. If the answer is "NO", then there is no point to put up a pretence of coalition when one does not help each other.
Therefore, I urge BaruBian not to be so adamant about clinging on to PR Sarawak which, in essence, was broken the minute PAS shown its true colour and pursued the hududagenda.
I believe, more can be achieved for the betterment of Sarawak with PKR Sarawak cooperating with DAP Sarawak rather than cooperating with PAS Sarawak.

Chong Chieng Jen
DAP Sarawak Chairman
Member of Parliament for Bandar Kuching
ADUN for Kota Sentosa