Comment on AJ & Rashdan: What “COST CUTTING”? – Part 1 by Razak of MAS Posted: 05 Mar 2012 02:50 AM PST Olek Skilganon Most ideal was for MAHB to take actions. But during the Sleepy Period ? 4th Floor, AirAsia was untouchable. On top of owing airport tax, the Sleepy Head government went ahead to build a warehouse style LCCT costing RM125 million and in a year or two later spend another RM100 million to renovate it. The contractor was Fajah Baru Rembau! So do you what is Rembau? If MAHB got a free hand I am sure that MAHB would have taken them to the cleaner. So we can compare Malaysia with Singapore. If we are like Singapore, AirAsia’s landing right would have been withdrawn until they pay up the airport tax. What don’t you also suggest that MAS should not have given up about 90 of its routes to AirAsia when instructed to do so? YB please check what happen to the 30,000 passengers to London on AIrAsia after it has cancellation its flight. If MAS had to take over, please check at what price and whether the fare have been paid to MAS. |
Comment on AJ & Rashdan: What “COST CUTTING”? – Part 1 by Anonymous Posted: 05 Mar 2012 02:39 AM PST Jasper Bloodstone What are rumbling on? MSA, Singapore, Changi and etc. Please tell us which country in the world including your chosen Singapore will allow an airlines to owe airport tax amounting to RM120 million over many years and upon payment got a discount of 30%. Which government in the world will take profitable routes away from its own national airlines? by the way do you know what is the role of the airlines or your chosen airlines AirAsia in the collection of airport tax? Let me tell you that AirAsia just like any airlines is just a collecting agent of airport tax and to pass on whatever amount collected to the airport authority. Airport tax was not meant to be used as working capital, due. Please answer the above questions on airport tax issue. We all want to hear your views on it. |
Comment on AJ & Rashdan: What “COST CUTTING”? – Part 1 by Olek Skilgannon Posted: 05 Mar 2012 02:31 AM PST Razak of MAS If AirAsia owed RM120 million to Malaysia Airports (MAHB), why didn’t MAHB take them to court to recover the outstanding amount plus interest? It’s a simple enough decision, yes, and as a public-listed company, your shareholders would expect you to do so? Are you saying that MAHB, out of the kindness of their hearts, looked the other way or gave AirAsia the benefit of the doubt? Or played footsie with AirAsia to the detriment of their shareholders? You are right that AirAsia wouldn’t pull such a stunt in Singapore. But in Singapore, things are transparent and enforceable by a well-regarded judicial system! |
Comment on AJ & Rashdan: MAS or MAS management is in crisis? by The Crony Rashdan Posted: 05 Mar 2012 02:28 AM PST The Pumkiner Creative accounting and using big word like “non-core”, “making asset light airlines” “widespread asset un-bundling – (WAU) are what Danny little boy cum crony is good for. Typical brainless consultant trying yo bull shit his way. Then you have AJ, the budak suruhan just follow like a cow. All these personalities are contributing to the Panamera Deadwood, drawing big salaries and perks with no or little contributions. Tak malu kah Danny boy cum crony???? For how long do you want to be Azman Crony. Where is your self respect? |
Comment on AJ & Rashdan: What “COST CUTTING”? – Part 1 by Jasper Bloodstone Posted: 04 Mar 2012 11:48 PM PST AirAsia did not expand into Singapore? What have you been smoking, dude, and what planet are you on? AirAsia Malaysia is one of the biggest LCCs, in terms of pax numbers, operating out of Changi Airport. This is not counting the pax numbers to Changi contributed by AirAsia’s Indonesian and Thai affiliates. |
Comment on AJ & Rashdan: What “COST CUTTING”? – Part 1 by Jasper Bloodstone Posted: 04 Mar 2012 11:41 PM PST Sorry, my post got partially chewed up by my smartphone. Anyway, back to the questions: - was MAS consistently profitable from the year it was set up until when AirAsia came into being? - why did the government ask Tajudin Ramli to take over MAS and subsequently buy him out, sue him and then settle out of court? I don’t seem to remember Pak Lah or Tony F being involved in these corporate prestidigations! |
Comment on AJ & Rashdan: What “COST CUTTING”? – Part 1 by Jasper Bloodstone Posted: 04 Mar 2012 11:29 PM PST Razak of MAS So much misplaced angst and woolly thinking, which is basically par for the course. I asked a simple question – how can SIA make profits under the same environmen of fuel prices? Shall we revisit thee negotiations that led to the splitting of Malaysia-Singapore Airlines into Malaysia Airlines and Singapore Airlines |
Comment on AJ & Rashdan: MAS or MAS management is in crisis? by The Pumkiner Posted: 04 Mar 2012 06:04 PM PST One typical accounting trick used by new management (they never failed to apply this) is the ‘cookie jar accounting’. – Google it up. Make full (read -excessive) provisions (accounting lingo for this now – allowance/impairment charge) and blame everything to previous management. The new management then will be able to show ‘tremendous turnaround’ in the next reporting period/year. Danny boy can’t wait to appear in the press and present himself as the savior of the national carrier. |
Comment on Abused of “1MALAYSIA” logo by Eby Posted: 04 Mar 2012 05:42 PM PST untuk perhatian semua… bazar tersebut telah diratakan oleh UMNO Wangsa Maju…. dan telah dihentikan… semua orang tau ini semua dibawah UMNO dan tidak perlu menyalahkan pihak lain |
Comment on AJ & Rashdan: What “COST CUTTING”? – Part 1 by soon zoo Posted: 04 Mar 2012 05:16 PM PST wooit…. just a scrap paper for the blind minded like you…. Goons Species..!! |