Selasa, 15 Mei 2012

Comments for Wee Choo Keong

Comments for Wee Choo Keong

Comment on The Voyage Report on the scandalous “Nanny” Danny by MAS Guy

Posted: 15 May 2012 09:38 AM PDT

I thought that the Danny boy is supposed to invoke God’s name another name to prove his innocent.

AJ, the idiot, what the F..k are you going to with this Danny boy and, of course, your useless self? You know you are wasting your time and everybody else time by hanging on to the post of Group CEO when you doing nothing except to protect the Pariah and this Dany boy.

Comment on The Voyage Report on the scandalous “Nanny” Danny by KL Ang

Posted: 14 May 2012 11:41 PM PDT

Dear YB. Is the below story printed in the Star (13-5-2012) to reply to your story The Voyage Report on the scandalous "Nanny" Danny ??? You can read it here….. http://thestar.com.my/columnists/story.asp?col=prioritylane&file=/2012/5/13/columnists/prioritylane/20120513102153&sec=Priority%20Lane

Sunday May 13, 2012

The kids, the help and the classy traveller

PRIORITY LANE By SNOBAMA

When flying First Class, it would help if a few basic rules are met, especially when you're bringing the entire family.

I have always believed that class is in-born. It is something that one either has or one does not. You can't go out and buy it, just because you think you can afford it. It comes naturally. It's that certain quality that differentiates old money from new. Old money is always tasteful, understated yet consistently elegant and stylish.

The nouveau riche on the other hand, are, more often than not, crass, loud and at times vulgar. In fact, sometimes class has no association with money whatsoever. You can have no money and still have class, and you can have all the money in the world and be as tacky as a neon sign in a red-light district.

One of the things that make tacky people, well, tacky, is the way they constantly want the world to know they have money. If you have an ounce of class within you, you will know you don't have to advertise your wealth for people to recognize your worth. On the contrary, you always conduct yourself with dignity and consideration, putting propriety of conduct above your own vanity. The tell-tale signs of your wealth, if at all, should be peripheral. People may notice, but not because you shove it in their faces.

I'm not sure if it's the sign of the times but there are more people now who try very, very hard to make people know they are wealthy or important. As a frequent traveller, I find that nothing encapsulates this more than the people who proudly travel with the kids and the hired help. And they want the world to know that their ability to afford this must mean they are really rolling in dough.

I have no objection to people travelling with their kids and domestic staff. If it does nothing to your bank balance and it makes your life easier, then why not? By all means, go forth with your brood and drag the maids with you. But I feel that there is some etiquette in doing that. Not only so that you don't inconvenience those unfortunate enough to be travelling with you, but also so that you wont be judged tacky or of not having any class.

This is particularly important when you are flying on a commercial airline. I am sorry, but I cannot stand those families with screaming kids all sitting in First Class along with the maids. I think that's only acceptable if you take up the entire First Class section.

Otherwise you rob other passengers of the enjoyment of the First Class experience for which they have paid huge sums of money. Here's the newsflash: People are too polite to tell you, but the fact is, nobody likes the ceaseless chatter of your annoying little child except you; their running up and down the aisles with the maids chasing after them is not adorable; and no one wants to hear your spoiled little brat screaming when he or she doesn't get everything he or she wants.

If you must travel with your whole household in tow, then you should always bear in mind the comfort of other passengers. That's the kind of consideration that shows you have class. For one thing, it is simply inappropriate for maids and nannies to fly in the same class as you, unless, as mentioned earlier, there is only you up there and no one else. Otherwise it may make other passengers uncomfortable.

Secondly, if you must have your domestic staff along with you, they should be suitably attired, ideally in uniforms or outfits which define clearly that they are workers travelling with their employers.

They (and perhaps your unruly children) should be seated in a different section of the aircraft and only occasionally be called to attend to you if necessary. If you have a problem child who cannot be separated from you, then short of flying private or not travelling at all, you should seat yourself in the lesser class with your problem child and the maids so that the end result is that you don't make others suffer for your personal comfort. Self sacrifice is always laudable and appreciated, whereas inconveniencing others so that you can have it easy is quite plainly, tacky.

I know of a very refined couple who insist that their children and the maids, nannies and their what-have-yous travel ahead and wait for them at their destination. This allows them to travel later, lighter and in far greater style and elegance than they would have, were they to be with the entire clan. But I guess this may not be an option for many, nor indeed something many would be inclined to do.

Whatever it is, the point I am trying to make is simple. Don't be the anecdote that other travellers tell when describing what a horrible flight they have had. Sympathize with the people who have to suffer the antics of you and your clan, rather than expect them to be sympathetic of the fact that you have to travel with your unruly kids and the maids that can't control them. It's irrelevant that you can afford to take your kids, the maids, and the maid's uncles to fly First Class with you. What matters is that you realize that doing so is simply inappropriate. That is the distinction between having class or not.

■ Snobama thinks the best option is just to buy one’s own airplane.

Comment on The Voyage Report on the scandalous “Nanny” Danny by Anti Cronyism in MAS

Posted: 14 May 2012 11:03 PM PDT

AJ why are you and the Board still condoning the abused of power by the maid upgrader Nanny Danny?

Tak malukah Nanny Danny? Isteri dan keluarga si Nanny Danny tak malukah dengan tingkah laku si Nanny Danny?

Ptui! kepada AJ dan nanny Danny.

Comment on NO to Share “SUAP”, NO to Rashdan, Shane Nollan, PlaneConsult, Rozman Omar, Azhari Dahlan, Nor Zalida & others by MAS observer

Posted: 14 May 2012 08:18 PM PDT

The new management under AJ is not going anywhere. He is good at helping the Pariah and condoning the Nanny Danny. Both AJ and nanny Danny must go before MAS can talk about recovery plan. there is no longer respect for this budak suruhan AJ. nanny Danny is definitely is no longer acceptable to MAS staff. The only only way for Nanny Danny is to get out and be with his maid.

Comment on The Voyage Report on the scandalous “Nanny” Danny by Lantau a/l Lagin

Posted: 14 May 2012 07:20 PM PDT

bodoh sombong, danny the nanny ni, muka tak tau malu, kesian ibu bapa dia, kesian family dia.
punya anak macam dia. Danny orang kampong dah tau,
chou lah…dari MAS.

Comment on The Voyage Report on the scandalous “Nanny” Danny by megat

Posted: 14 May 2012 05:31 PM PDT

Captain of MAS must have their wings clipped as well. Enjoying all the perks and also seems shielded from punishment. Time for management to review these overpaid pilots who always get the best terms & conditions in their CA time over time. Some even accorded Datukship for doing nothing. Yes time to keep these little Napoleon’s in check as they think they are indespensable and has become kepala besar and arrogant .
Dicatat oleh di

Tiada ulasan:

Catat Ulasan

Langgan: Catat Ulasan (Atom)

Nuffnang