Comments for Wee Choo Keong |
- Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by The Gooberman
- Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by MAS Boy
- Comment on 21-11-2012 Questions Time: EXCO MAS berseteju menaja pasukan QPR by Anonymous
- Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by Anonymous
- Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by Poseidon's Spear
- Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by Anonymous
- Comment on “IT PREYS ON UNREST” untuk “REGIME CHANGE”! by Mun
- Comment on “IT PREYS ON UNREST” untuk “REGIME CHANGE”! by Rakan Lama
- Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by Anonymous
Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by The Gooberman Posted: 26 Nov 2012 03:18 AM PST Anon 4:16 PM And how is that different from MAS, pray tell? Just how many times has MAS been bailed out and restructured using the excuse of “national service”? Why is the government having to guarantee RM5.3 billion of Islamic notes for MAS to finance it’s fleet modernisation? Please educate us how AirAsia’s growth model is different from, say, Ryanair, easyjet, Southwest Airlines, Jetstar and the much-ballyhooed Lion Air. That isn’t too much to ask, is it? |
Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by MAS Boy Posted: 26 Nov 2012 12:52 AM PST Star has been used an insturment by the pariah to do damage control for him. Nothing was published by Star on the news about AA has been given another 6 months to apply for new AOC because of non-compliance to regulations. Is this information concerning safety of air travel not important? Surely Star should have reported this but not in this matter. At the same time, Star has space to stupid thing like quoting the Pariah and/or Aireen the new CEO on not importnat matter. We have seen it through the Star and its scheme re the pariah. |
Comment on 21-11-2012 Questions Time: EXCO MAS berseteju menaja pasukan QPR by Anonymous Posted: 26 Nov 2012 12:35 AM PST 9-8-2011 until cancellation (reverse) transactions on 2-5-2012 Tony used this time to get malaysian airlines more business . This sounds patriotic. is it true TONY got MAS to pay millions of GBP to sponsor his very own QPR team? TONYS reasoning was MAS advertised on the uniforms of his QPR team. This incited many travellers to fly MAS airlines and MAS sales increased immediately. TONY TONY any one with any sense can tell that this is a lie. If it isnt a lie then the truth is TONY is not patriotic enough. Nothing short of a hungry capitalist If you were patriotic enough then you may have suggested MAS to advertise on Tshirts of ManU or Arsenal or other much better teams for BETTER MAS sales revenues. Any ways wasnt TONYS workout of share swapper gangnam style and getting QPR paid gangnam style a conflict of interest ? |
Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by Anonymous Posted: 26 Nov 2012 12:16 AM PST the head has been suspended at AA on account of this I AM SURPRISED. One touch of a internal button raises ripples across media and other disguised / masked government lobbyists or links. TONI TONI you got bloated bloated and built it in the sky Little did you realize you built it all on sand. Not yet all is blown away….. when people provided you the rock and true passion you stole it away or you damaged them and threw them away. Insulted them with your might and power. toni toni lied he cherished passion, he eyed good staff and valued true principles……………… The truth is Tony loved fame, he got carried away …….he forgot his religious fundamentals of building growth on rock ,,,,, tony tony engineered media to his advantage,,,more than any millionaire to make people believe to confuse the naive,,,, no industrialist had such passion and greed for fame as much as toni toni today even kids i talk to say tony bloody air asia get out of u tube you are flooding it with your ads |
Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by Poseidon's Spear Posted: 25 Nov 2012 09:30 PM PST Well – we know, at least, that ST Aerospace’s MRO facilities are FAA-certified. So, are you implying that the Singapore company will compromise on standards and “cut corners” in carrying out scheduled MRO work on AirAsia’s aircraft? That would be a claim that I think YB Wee would be unwilling to countenance. So, spell it out – just exactly what are you implying under the cloak of anonymity? |
Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by Anonymous Posted: 25 Nov 2012 08:39 PM PST MAS penah crash kan? berapa mati? Airasia? MAS flight byk lipas….euww? Cabin Crew rm8 sejam….thats why best cabin staff maa, now malindo plak? |
Comment on “IT PREYS ON UNREST” untuk “REGIME CHANGE”! by Mun Posted: 25 Nov 2012 07:23 PM PST It was an open secret that the police have been known to have raided karaoke and bars and arrested foreign girls but none have been charged and deported. The Minister must investigate this matter. It is also shocking to know that foreign fund has been coming into the country in supporting SUARAM. This is very serious. What is the Government is doing about this. How could Bank Negara not knowing this at all? |
Comment on “IT PREYS ON UNREST” untuk “REGIME CHANGE”! by Rakan Lama Posted: 25 Nov 2012 06:49 PM PST Average Joe senang je nak tau..sebab yb dedahkan niat sebenar mereka. Negara kita untuk kita bukan untuk Amarika atau lain2 kuasa asing..! Tahniah YB. |
Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by Anonymous Posted: 25 Nov 2012 06:34 PM PST I would fear for my life now, not only for bookings beyond Feb. |
You are subscribed to email updates from Comments for Wee Choo Keong To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
Tiada ulasan:
Catat Ulasan