Rabu, 10 Julai 2013

Lim Guan Eng

Lim Guan Eng

Where Is The Logic Of The Home Minister That The Royal Commission Of Inquiry Into PDRM, Is Making An Unconstitutional Proposal Of Setting Up An Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC), When Its Chairman Tun Mohamed Dzaiddin Bin Haji Abdullah Was The 9th Chief Justice Of Malaysia?(en/bm/cn)

Posted: 09 Jul 2013 10:46 PM PDT

Press Statement By DAP Secretary-General And MP For Bagan Lim Guan Eng In Petaling Jaya On 10.7.2013.

Home Minister Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi continues to surprise Malaysians with his reckless claims and perverse logic that establishing the IPCMC will result in overlapping jurisdictions and laws among the county’s enforcement agencies, as well as being unconstitutional and contrary to the concept of justice. Where is the logic of the Home Minister that the Royal Commission Of Inquiry into PDRM, is making an unconstitutional proposal of setting up an IPCMC, when its chairman Tun Mohamed Dzaiddin Bin Haji Abdullah was the 9thChief Justice of Malaysia?

This is the first time since the recommendations were first made in 2005 that the IPCMC has been declared unconstitutional by the BN Federal government as a flimsy excuse for rejecting its establishment. Zahid's wild claim is a slur on the reputation of the highest judge in Malaysia and questions his basic legal competency in making an unconstitutional proposal.

Zahid is not a lawyer and he should ask the Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail to forward legal arguments how setting up the IPCMC is unconstitutional. Should Zahid fail to prove his claims, he should apologise to Tun Mohamed Dzaiddin for putting Tun Dzaiddin's legal expertise into disrepute.

Such wild claims by the Home Minister to justify the unjustifiable and defend the indefensible in the face of overwhelming factual evidence to the contrary, has been the governing approach adopted by the BN Federal government. When Suhakam chairperson Hasmy Agam opposed the reinstatement of the Emergency Ordinance (EO), an upset police officer Senior Assistant Commissioner Mohad Nazir openly repudiated Hasmy by saying that “prevention is better than cure”.

Hasmy had correctly pointed out the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Scotland Yard, Interpol, the Los Angeles Police Department and the Victoria Police as notable examples of good policing without an EO. In response, Mohad retorted that even the United States had the Patriot Act and Guantanamo Bay for the purpose of homeland security. Mohad is wrong because such laws in the United States are intended to combat terrorism and not crime.

Such ignorance by Mohad cannot be faulted as the Home Minister is also equally guilty, giving full credence to the adage that "a little knowledge is a dangerous thing". However Ahmad Zahid cannot be so easily forgiven for continuing to sully the reputation of his office by failing to uphold the laws but instead choose to conveniently label any proposal that the BN government wishes to reject as "unconstitutional".

Lim Guan Eng

—–BM Version —–
Kenyataan Media oleh Setiausaha Agung DAP merangkap Ahli Parlimen Bagan, Lim Guan Eng di Petaling Jaya pada 10 Julai 2013.

Apa munasabahnya Menteri Dalam Negeri mengatakan bahawa Suruhanjaya Siasatan Di Raja untuk menyiasat Polis Di Raja Malaysia (PDRM) mengadakan cadangan yang bertentangan dengan Perlembagaan Persekutuan untuk mewujudkan IPCMC, sedangkan Pengerusi Suruhanjaya itu sendiri ialah Tun Mohamed Dzaiddin Bin Haji Abdullah, Ketua Hakim Negara ke-9.

Menteri Dalam Negeri Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi terus mengejutkan rakyat Malaysia dengan kenyataan dan logik peliknya bahawa mewujudkan IPCMC akan mengakibatkan pertindihan bidang kuasa dan bertentangan dengan konsep keadilan. Apa munasabahnya Menteri Dalam Negeri mengatakan bahawa Suruhanjaya Siasatan Di Raja untuk menyiasat Polis Di Raja Malaysia (PDRM) mengadakan cadangan yang bertentangan dengan Perlembagaan Persekutuan untuk mewujudkan IPCMC, sedangkan Pengerusi Suruhanjaya itu sendiri ialah Tun Mohamed Dzaiddin Bin Haji Abdullah, Ketua Hakim Negara ke-9.

Ini adalah pertama kali sejak cadangan tersebut dibuat pada tahun 2005 bahawa IPCMC diisytihar tidak berperlembagaan oleh Kerajaan Persekutuan BN, satu alasan yang amat lemah untuk menolak penubuhannya. Tuduhan liar Zahid adalah satu penghinaan kepada reputasi hakim tertinggi di Malaysia serta mempersoalkan kemahiran asas undang-undangnya kerana membuat cadangan yang bertentangan dengan Perlembagaan.

Zahid bukanlah seorang peguam, beliau sepatutnya meminta Peguam Negara Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail supaya memajukan hujah-hujah perundangan tentang bagaimana penubuhan IPCMC itu bertentangan Perlembagaan. Sekiranya Zahid gagal membuktikan tuduhannya, beliau patut memohon maaf kepada Tun Mohamed Dzaiddin kerana menghina kepakaran undang-undang beliau.

Tuduhan liar seperti yang dibuat Menteri Dalam Negeri demi menegakkan benang yang basah serta untuk mempertahankan sesuatu yang tidak dapat dipertahankan apabila berhadapan dengan bukti-bukti dan fakta jelas, adalah pendekatan yang digunapakai Kerajaan Persekutuan BN sejak sekian lama. Apabila Pengerusi Suhakam Hasmy Agam menentang cadangan mengembalikan Ordinan Darurat (EO), seorang pegawai polis yang kecewa, SAC Mohad Nazir secara terbuka membantah Hasmy dengan mengatakan bahawa 'mencegah lebih baik dari mengubati'.

Hasmy telah memberikan contoh tepat bahawa Pasukan Polis Berkuda Di Raja Kanada, Scotland Yard, Interpol dan pasukan polis Los Angeles serta Victoria Police sebagai pasukan polis yang berkesan dan baik tanpa memerlukan EO. Begitu pun, Mohad menjawab bahawa Amerika Syarikat pun mempunyai Akta Patriot dan penjara Guantanamo Bay bagi tujuan keselamatan dalam negeri. Mohad sebenarnya salah kerana undang-undang tersebut di Amerika Syarikat adalah bertujuan memerangai pengganas dan bukan untuk memerangi jenayah.

Kejahilan Mohad ini tidak boleh disalahkan kerana Menteri Dalam Negeri pun sama bersalah, justeru membenarkan kata pepatah bahawa ilmu yang sedikit itu amat berbahaya. Namun Ahmad Zahid tidak boleh senang-senang dimaafkan kerana terus-menerus memburukkan reputasi jabatannya apabila gagal mendaulatkan undang-undang, malah sebaliknya pula memilih untuk melabel apa sahaja cadangan yang mahu ditolak BN sebagai melanggar Perlembagaan.
LIM GUAN ENG

—-Mandarin version—-

民主行动党秘书长兼峇眼区国会议员林冠英于2013年7月10日在八打灵再也发表声明：

内政部长说，警察皇家调查委员会要求设立独立警察投诉及行为不检委员会（IPCMC）是不符合宪法的建议，这是什么逻辑？况且，当时的皇委会主席还是我国第9任大法官敦莫哈末再丁。

内政部长拿督斯里阿末再益继续发表糊涂及不逻辑的言论，他说，设立独立警察投诉及行为不检委员会（IPCMC）将导致国家执法机关的权限重叠，违反宪法以及有违反公义理念。警察皇家调查委员会要求设立独立警察投诉及行为不检委员会（IPCMC）是不符合宪法的建议，这是什么逻辑？况且，当时的皇委会主席还是我国第9任大法官敦莫哈末再丁。

这是皇委会自2005年提出有关建议后，联邦政府第一次宣布这项建议不符合宪法，以这种理由来拒绝成立独立警察投诉及行为不检委员会，实在站不住脚。再益的胡言乱语以及指大法官的建议不符合宪法，这对我国大法官的声誉简直是一种侮辱，甚至质疑其法律基础。

再益不是律师，他应该叫总检察长丹斯里阿都干尼拿出法律证据，说明成立独立警察投诉及行为不检委员会如何违反宪法？如果再益无法拿出证据，他应该对敦莫哈末再丁道歉，因为他的言论直接损害了敦再丁身为法律专家的名声。

内政部长的胡言乱语只是为了勉强地为辩解及维护不合理事件，把黑说成白，这正是国阵联邦政府向来的施政作风。当大马人权委员会主席哈斯米阿甘反对恢复紧急法令时，一个高级助理警官莫哈纳兹尔竟生气并公开批判哈斯米，说"预防胜于治疗"。

哈斯米正确地指出加拿大皇家警察、伦敦警方、国际刑警组织、洛杉矶警察局及维州警方在没有紧急法令的情况下，依然是杰出的警队。莫哈反驳说，就连美国为了境内的安全也有《美国爱国法》及关塔那摩湾拘押中心。莫哈说错了，美国上述法令是为了反恐，而不是对付罪案。

我们不能责怪莫哈的无知，因为内政部长也一样有错，正所谓一知半解是危险的。但是，我们不能轻易原谅阿末莫希继续破坏其办公室的名声，他不但不捍卫法律，而是像国阵政府那样，将所有不想做的事标签为"违宪"，这也是最轻松容易的做法。

林冠英

Increasing Available Human Talent Manpower, Resolving Traffic Gridlock, Supplying Adequate Affordable Housing And Making Penang Clean, Green, Safe And Healthy Will Be Crucial Towards Realising Penang’s Aspirations As An International And Intelligent City.(en/cn)

Posted: 09 Jul 2013 08:15 PM PDT

Speech by the Rt. Hon. Mr. Lim Guan Eng, Penang Chief Minister on 9 July 2013 – Penang Investment Promotion Seminar at Orchard Hotel, Singapore Released In Penang On 10.7.2013.

Increasing Available human talent manpower, resolving traffic gridlock, supplying adequate affordable housing and making Penang clean, green, safe and healthy will be crucial towards realising penang's aspirations as an international and intelligent city. According to the World Bank, in order to reach our goal of becoming a high-income nation, Malaysia will need to continue building skills and institutions that will support further diversification towards higher productive investments through improvements in human capital.

For this reason, the Penang government has crafted the Penang Paradigm, a 10-year development blueprint from 2013-2023 that is focused on economic vibrancy, liveability, sustainability as well as social development and inclusion. The Penang Paradigm aims to achieve these goals by focusing on five thrusts:
1) combatting poverty and socio-economic inequality;
2) ensuring environmental sustainability;
3) attracting, training, retraining and retaining human talent;
4) democratic empowerment; and
5) implementing good governance.

Socio-economic inequality is now widely believed to be an impediment to economic growth. In the last five years, we have become the first state in Malaysia to institutionalise annual financial assistance programmes for the poor and marginalised, such as senior citizens, the disabled, students as well as single mothers.

This year, Penang will become the first state in Malaysia to eradicate poverty altogether by ensuring a minimum household income of RM770 a month, which is higher than the national Poverty Line Indicator (PLI) of RM763 a month. Any household with less than RM770 a month will receive a "top-up" payment every month from the State Government.

Secondly, it is critical to ensure that all development is sustainable and environmentally friendly. Penang's success in moving towards becoming the first green state in Malaysia is widely acknowledged from being the only state in Malaysia to have no free plastic bags and shopping centers to recording the highest recycling rate in the country at 26%.

Thirdly, while the last century was driven by the race for resources, this century will be driven by the race for talent. The state government has adopted a 3-prong approach to build human talent through annual allocation of funds to schools, attracting top universities for top students and establishing Penang Learning Centers to provide remedial teaching for academically weak students to create a rising tide effect to benefit the largest pool of students possible.

Fourthly, a society can only progress if it is democratically empowered where Penang respect basic freedoms and human rights. Last but not least, a most vital aspect of ensuring equitable growth and prosperity is good and clean governance through our famous CAT governance of Competency, Accountability and Transparency (CAT). Through CAT governance, we became the first state to implement open competitive tenders and public declaration of assets of EXCO members and Chief Ministers.

This has translated into surplus budgets every year since 2008, reducing our state debts by 95 per cent and increased our state assets by 50% over the last five years. Transparency International has praised Penang State for having a clean government that fights corruption and practice open tender.

In summary, Penang has adopted five implementation measures:
1. Wiping out poverty and reducing the socio-economic gap.
2. Implementing green policies to achieve environmental sustainability.
3. Developing, attracting and retaining the required human capital in order to compete globally.
4. Empowering the people through democratic processes.
5. Fighting corruption and cronyism through good and clean governance.

Lim Guan Eng

—-Mandarin Version —
槟州首席部长林冠英于2013年7月10日在新加坡槟城投资讲座谈会上发表演讲，重点如下：

增加人力资源，解决交通阻塞、提供可负担房屋及打造净绿安康的槟城，是让槟城迈向国际及智能都市的关键因素。

增加人力资源，解决交通阻塞、提供可负担房屋及打造净绿安康的槟城，是让槟城迈向国际及智能都市的关键因素。根据世界银行，为了成为高收入国家，马来西亚必须继续提升能支持多元化的技术和机构，通过提升人力资源素质，走向高产价值的投资。

因此，槟州政府已经拟出《槟城典范》，即2013至2023年的10年发展大蓝图，将集中在经济活力、宜居、可持续、社会发展及包容性。槟城典范的宗旨是要通过五个方面取得成就：
1) 扫除贫穷及社会经济不平等;
2) 确保环境永续;
3) 吸引、培训、再培训及留住人才;
4) 赋权民主;
5) 良好施政

社会经济不平等已经被视为经济发展的绊脚石。过去五年，我们成为马来西亚第一个制度化拨款给贫穷及被边缘化群体的州属，例如乐龄人士、残障人士、学生及单亲妈妈。

今年，槟城将成为全马第一个扫除贫穷的州属，确保家庭最低月入为770令吉，高出全国贫穷线RM763。任保家庭若月入低入770令吉，州政府将补贴余数。

第二，我们要确保所有的发展都是可持续及环境友善的。槟州是全马第一个在购物广场成为推行无免费塑料袋的州属，我们也正迈向绿州，我们的再循环率为26%，全国居冠。

第三，上一个世纪是资源的竞争，本世经将是人才的竞争。州政府已经三管齐下，通过常年拨款给学校、吸引顶尖大学、成立槟州学习中心辅助学习进度落后的学生，栽培人才。

第四、一个社会唯有赋权民主才能进步，槟州尊重基本自由及人权，最重要的是确保合理公平增长及繁荣的能干、公信及透明施政（CAT）方针。我们是全马第一个实行公开竞争招标及公布行政议员及首长财政的州属。

于是，我们自2008年开始财政预算年年有余，州政府的负债减少95%，州政府的资产增加50%。就连国际透明组织也称赞槟州政府廉洁、肃贪及推行公开招标。

简而言之，州政府已经推行下列五大措施：
1. 扫除贫穷及拉近社会经济鸿沟
2. 实施绿色政策，达致环境永续
3. 栽培、吸引及留住人才以在国际上竞争
4. 通过民主过程赋权予民
5. 通过良好施政打击贪污及朋党

林冠英
Dicatat oleh di

Tiada ulasan:

Catat Ulasan

Langgan: Catat Ulasan (Atom)

Nuffnang