Isnin, 27 Ogos 2012

Comments for Wee Choo Keong

Comments for Wee Choo Keong

Comment on Azhari’s new reporting structure by Anonymous

Posted: 27 Aug 2012 05:10 AM PDT

The problem with MAS is the little Napoleons in Khazanah will just appoint clueless idiot after idiot to head MAS. The worst was the appointment of the Clueless a CEO after the share SUAP.

Please examine carefully about all the decisions made by the little Napoleons in Khazanah for MAS. It would appear that they want ed to see MAS koyak so that the pariah’s airline can expand.

Just look at the example:

1. How could it allow MAS to sign a one sided contract with LSG Sky Chef Brahim’s Sdn Bhd for 25 years? Prices for food, beverages and others services are ridiculous high? The foods were of poor standard if compared with other premier airline.

2. Sale of MAS prime assets overseas and Malaysia.

3. The pariah’s airline owed more than RM100 million in airport tax and MAHB dared not take actions against the pariah.

4. Allowing the clueless management headed by the Clueless and Nanny Danny to make stupid decisions:

uplifting 35000 AAX passengers with fares unheard of in the market,

paying sponsoring of RM10.3 million to QPR,

appointment of Shane Nolan, PlaneConsult (the low cost CONsultant) which is
also the consultant for the pariah’s airline;

termination of profit routes Bandung, Dubai, Haneda, Johannesburg and etc

allowing the infiltration of the MAS Board by the Pariah;

allowing the appointment of AA’s officers into top management of MAS (e.g. Rozman Omar as CFO, Shane Nollan as Acting Commercial Director and that Botak Azhari Dhalan who is still trying to hang on at all costs)

The list is just too long!

Now we have a clueless CEO. MAS is doomed!

The PM must get rid of the little napoleons in Khazanah for the sake of all the GLCs and those Clueless directors in MAS otherwise MAS will be in the shit. Tan Sri Azman and Tan Sri Tan Boon Seng must be rid of as soon as possible and replace by good people with some aviation knowledge.

Comment on Azhari’s new reporting structure by GE Man

Posted: 27 Aug 2012 04:26 AM PDT

The new line up is top become heavier then before , contrary to bo(otak) head Azhari ex , AA engineering is a pyramid style management line up.

With top heavy cost will go up !!

There is no SVN ( Staff Vacancy Notices) issued for the promotion to many of these new head/managers .

It also need new costing and new position allocation which had been bulldoze thru’ HC biscuit lady by bo(otak) head Azhari ,sanctioned by clueless AJ .

This bo(otak) head is running MAS Engineering like iron fist dictator .

MASEU and MESA , you should protest , no SVN was issued for the promotion of this few head/managers .

Mud Dooh , you selalu cakap berapi-api bila masa town hall , dulu pandai hang bubuh Danny , Md Nor…,. why sekarang sonyap ajo….

Comment on Organisational Chart No: ? by The Gooberman

Posted: 27 Aug 2012 01:36 AM PDT

It seems to me that there are a legion of self-anointed “aviation experts” out there, each with their instant analyses and profound recommendations.

It’s time to get real.

For instance, how is MAS going to compete against the well-funded Gulf airlines – Emirates, Etihad and Qatar Airways?

What does KLIA have to offer against the ultramodern air hubs in Dubai, Abu Dhabi and Qatar?

Or, nearer to home, Changi, Incheon and Hong Kong Airports?

Malaysia Airports has been keeping mum because they don’t have any strategy to support an air hub ambition. That’s a fact. And they don’t have the funds to do a thorough makeover of KLIA.

It is strangely relevant that AirAsia has decided to contract the maintenance of it’s Airbus A320 fleet to Singapore Technologies Aerospace Engineering. ST Aero Engineering has approvals and quality endorsements from a whole bunch of aviation regulators, including Malaysa/DCA, Australia/CASA, Indonesia/DGCA and the US/FAA.

So all those who thought that AirAsia could be “blackmailed” or “strongarmed” into meek compliance with the “zealots” in Malaysia have had a rude awakening.

Including, maybe, a Malaysia Airports that seems to be more interested in duking it out with AirAsia over KLIA2 than getting a handle on what it’s competitors are doing.

As for MAS, all the organisation charts in the world ain’t going to make an iota of difference if it’s staff, management and board remain ignorant of the fundamental changes sweeping the global airline industry.

What’s it that was said about Nero playing the fiddle while Rome was burning?

Comment on Azhari’s new reporting structure by Hafiz Yusof (@_hafiz)

Posted: 27 Aug 2012 12:09 AM PDT

citta mall looks pretty much empty and boring. I wonder how LKS got his deal there

Comment on Azhari’s new reporting structure by Anonymous

Posted: 26 Aug 2012 11:48 PM PDT

You can say, she resigned to migrate to and raise her children in Australia, like she has planned for some time.

Dont make up stories when there is none.

Comment on Azhari’s new reporting structure by Arifin Ismail

Posted: 26 Aug 2012 06:44 PM PDT

There is nothing new about the revised reporting structure. Apart from some internal re-alignment, the maintenance and engineering functions of MAS, including the Continuing Airworthiness Management (CAM) of the fleet has been consolidated under MAE.

MAS is the AOC holder and under the terms of the AOC is responsible for the Continuing Airworthiness Management of its fleet of aircraft. MAS is also required to appoint an Accountable Manager and a Nominated Post Holder who shall be responsible for the Continuing Airworthiness Management (CAM)function. Under EASA rules, the Nominated Post Holder cannot be an employee of the company under contract to the airline unless approved by competent authority.

MAE is a subsidiary company of MAS and is therefore a separate legal entity. By having the entire M&E function performed by MAE, MAS the AOC holder is in effect outsourcing its accountability for CAM to a “contractor” , albeit a subsidiary of the airline.

Although it is allowed to do so, MAS must have the means to determine that MAE is performing the M&E functions pertaining to the MAS fleet in accordance to airworthiness standards determined by the airline.

There is nothing in the organisation chart of MAS to show that it has an organisation or group under a Nominated Post Holder reporting to the Accountable Manager, to carry out audits and surveillance of its contactors including MAE.

AI

Comment on Organisational Chart No: ? by no lie

Posted: 26 Aug 2012 06:25 PM PDT

cerita benar, kalau nak tunjuk terer sekalipon, ini bukan tempatnyer. fcl ngan gccl tu dah salah. kan jauh bezanyer. kedua, awak tulis kat blog ni, “reply this comment nnt saya bagi tau namanyer”…bila dah reply, awak suruh refer kat orang lain….kutuk orang memang sedap, tapi lupa, diri sendiri pon buat silap.

Comment on Azhari’s new reporting structure by Time Traveller

Posted: 26 Aug 2012 06:24 PM PDT

Wah … got so many projects under Engg/MAE. But why we lost so many business to our competitors. Under CEO MAE ada projects, under Deputy CEO MAE also got projects, and if you look further down on right side, there is also a box for Aircraft Project (Mazlan Nordin). Have HR advised them properly in the org chart or not? Or HR also rubber stamp only. Hahahaha…

Comment on Azhari’s new reporting structure by Time Traveller

Posted: 26 Aug 2012 06:15 PM PDT

Dear Fedup,
Head of risk management dept also resigned, what else to say.
Dicatat oleh di

Tiada ulasan:

Catat Ulasan

Langgan: Catat Ulasan (Atom)

Nuffnang