Jumaat, 27 Julai 2012

Comments for Wee Choo Keong

Comments for Wee Choo Keong

Comment on MAHB should ignore “Low Cost Mentality”! by vinnie

Posted: 27 Jul 2012 08:45 AM PDT

The moment AA fail to pay airport tax by minimum rm 1, MAHB should stop AA flight from flying. This will make passenger angry for delay flight and AA for sure will pay ASAP. If Indonesia BEA and CUKAI dept can do, why not MAHB? MAHB can avoid giving 25million discount for delay payment. MAHB is different from Police Traffic where summon can get discount after few years not paying. Somebody should claim their money back from rm 25 million discount by SAMAN IN COURT because that money is not belong to AA but to passengers who fly with AA. And also rm 6 million tax from people who cant fly AA which u can read from YB Wee above. If one person pursue the SAMAN, then will be many will bring AA in court and u know what will happen to AA. They have to payback to all passengers for the money not belong to them.

Comment on MAHB should ignore “Low Cost Mentality”! by Ilham Putra

Posted: 27 Jul 2012 08:01 AM PDT

Kak Pidah Nyanyuk, when you were in MITI, did you practise giving the commitment as to how long it would take the MIDA building tobe constructed and ready for occupancy?

Tell us, tell us….. walk your talk…..before we call you names.

Comment on MAHB should ignore “Low Cost Mentality”! by Hisham

Posted: 26 Jul 2012 07:55 PM PDT

MAHB cannot be made to dance to the tune set by the pariah. He can’t blow hot and cold at the same time.

MAHB cannot do everything to accommodate the Pariah’s business model at the expense of the passengers/public. How can an airline demanded for a new airport to be built without aerobridge when aerobridge is not only for the convenience of the passengers who are children, pregnant women, handicap and the elderly but for the passengers safety of not having to walk on the tarmac.

The Pariah had already made in known that they are not going to move to KLIA-2 when it is operational so why was Rafidah asking MAHB to kow tow to the Pariah or to please the Pariah. Who is he? Just another operator that relied on the patronage of the Slumber Jack.

Let him go to Jakarta to try his luck and make all the demands. Hopefully he can demand a new airport in Jakarta to built for him and operated by him!

Let him ask the Jakarta authority to let him set his own airport charges and airport tax.

Comment on MAHB should ignore “Low Cost Mentality”! by Yong

Posted: 26 Jul 2012 06:58 PM PDT

A desperate woman trying to please her paymaster without thinking. She thought that the whole nation owed her paymaster a living. It was shameful of an educated person to sell her soul.

AirAsia is not indispensable. Please go to Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam and other countries. Just try to dictate terms to the authorities. For a start, just ask the authorities to built a RM100,000 runaway and tell them can AirAsia owe airport for just 5 ears and then get a good 30% incentive discount when paying?

Comment on AirAsia shouldn’t delay to terminate all its agreements with MAS by blue sky

Posted: 26 Jul 2012 05:02 PM PDT

don’t just terminate the agreements take back your Zalida and Azhari

Comment on MAHB should ignore “Low Cost Mentality”! by CONCERNED

Posted: 26 Jul 2012 04:01 PM PDT

I echo your thoughts 100%, and have posted in this blog before on the where the real rot really lies – inside MAS itself. Our own house is in a shambles, but we look for scapegoats to vent our anger and hatred on, even using foul and rascist language to run down TF and the rest. It doesn’t matter what race you are, if you have the will and wits to want to succeed, by fair means or foul, so what? That’s business, nothing personal. The Share Swap and collaboration happened because the state of MAS then allowed it to happen. Fine, so now the Share Swap is cancelled, more than two months ago, do we see MAS in turbo-charged fifth gear to get things “fixed”? Of course not. The same bureaucratic, take-your-own-sweet-time attitude, the same politicking, the same MINDSET, still continues. The collective leadership is, at best, mediocre. As for AJ, there is enough seen and said for all to form their own conclusions.Let us all ponder, deeply.

Comment on MAHB should ignore “Low Cost Mentality”! by Gofirefly

Posted: 26 Jul 2012 03:53 PM PDT

Interesting article from mastroubleshooters blogspot

Press Statement

Press Statement By Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Bin Abdul Rahman,
Former Managing Director of Malaysia Airline System
23 July 2012

“In the interest of the good name of our National Carrier and also the Nation, I suggest that colours of the Logo and livery on the A380 aircraft be reverted to the airline's original colours as soon as possible, before it is too late.”

The colours of the Logo and the Livery of the MAS A380 aircraft are outrageously wrong. They are wrong for at least two main reasons.

Firstly, the new colours have deviated from the original tradition and objective of the official colours of the national carrier. The colour of the logo has ignored the original tradition and history of the creation of the logo.

The original colour of the logo was red depicting one of the prominent colours of our Flag – the Jalur Gemilang as MAS is the country's Flag Carrier. Later, dark blue colour was added as one of the main colours of our flag. All these were chosen and approved by the government and in particular YAB Tun Abdul Razak. The airline operated throughout the periods of all the Prime Ministers in those colours.

The latest Prime Minister that approved the logo was Tun Mahathir Mohamad. I remember going to see him with the designer Encik Johan to get his blessing. He was the one who suggested that the Logo on the tail of the aircraft be tilted slightly to give the aerodynamic look.

Secondly, the new different colour of the Logo is in conflict with the basic principle of branding in business. It portrays the image of confusion among the consumers and reflects badly on the management. No business organization would do such a thing.

Furthermore, in this case the A380 aircraft will be flying all over the world. It will create a bad image for our National Carrier.

In the interest of the good name of our National Carrier and also the Nation, I suggest that colours of the Logo and livery on the A380 aircraft be reverted to the airline's original colours as soon as possible, before it is too late.

In this regard, I think the government should investigate to find out as to who had decided on the new colours without sound reasoning and direct the management accordingly.

Signed,

Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Bin Abdul Rahman
Posted by THE TROUBLESHOOTERS at 08:56

Comment on MAHB should ignore “Low Cost Mentality”! by HANANA BT ABDULLA

Posted: 26 Jul 2012 12:24 PM PDT

:

;

One should not the take Top Gear Program

as a serious car review. Look Jeremy is

a nobody- not a mechanical engineer or a

technical guy. He is just a celebrity

person on TV. He is known more

as a serial adulterer than an expert on cars.
.

My take on him is- he is on the take from a

a german car company about whose cars he always

give favourable comment.
.

If you had been following the series, JK would give favourable

reports on the British crap-the land Rover which incidentally

made news this few days. The most unreliable brand in the

world possibly.

.

kelisa is backed by Toyota- The world’s largets car company

who set its own high standards. the demo on the first video

showed that the Kelisa can still move after all the abuse

heaped on it.
.

Do you think a jaguar or a Land Rover can still start

and move fluidly after such an abuse?

Probably not.

And after it is stressed by a heavy weight

the body still maintain at least an 80 per cent form.

This is respectable. Try do that with a Jaguar and see

if it can maintain its form!

Anyway Top geaR IS NOT a technical program. Its

viewers are primarily youing and middle aged women.

Look at the shows -very few young men were present

in their shows.

It would not be fair to conclude anything serious on

a light entertainment program.

Three guys in the program represent the make up of

English society – two normal guy and a gay. And they

give a view that is popular with their fans.

England is a racist country but the gomen/courts

would say they are not. And their people cannot take

it that slit-eyed chingkies,indians and melayus can assemble

a reliable car like the Kelisa. In facts some 4/5 years ago

the Kelisa was ranked better than a Smart made by a an associate

company of Daimler benz[1]

Just read about the John Terry and Anton Ferdinand affair.

Mas employs an irish fella and one Barrow who come fr Great Brittain

and their words are like gold in the corridors of power

at MAs and probably Khazanah.

note

[1] either reviewed in Car or Autocar 2006/7

.

.

.

;

One should not the take Top Gear Program

as a serious car review. Look Jeremy is

a nobody- not a mechanical engineer or a

technical guy. He is just a celebrity

person on TV. He is known more

as a serial adulterer than an expert on cars.
.

My take on him is- he is on the take from a

a german car company about whose cars he always

give favourable comment.
.

If you had been following the series, JK would give favourable

reports on the British crap-the land Rover which incidentally

made news this few days. The most unreliable brand in the

world possibly.

.

kelisa is backed by Toyota- The world’s largets car company

who set its own high standards. the demo on the first video

showed that the Kelisa can still move after all the abuse

heaped on it.
.

Do you think a jaguar or a Land Rover can still start

and move fluidly after such an abuse?

Probably not.

And after it is stressed by a heavy weight

the body still maintain at least an 80 per cent form.

This is respectable. Try do that with a Jaguar and see

if it can maintain its form!

Anyway Top geaR IS NOT a technical program. Its

viewers are primarily youing and middle aged women.

Look at the shows -very few young men were present

in their shows.

It would not be fair to conclude anything serious on

a light entertainment program.

Three guys in the program represent the make up of

English society – two normal guy and a gay. And they

give a view that is popular with their fans.

England is a racist country but the gomen/courts

would say they are not. And their people cannot take

it that slit-eyed chingkies,indians and melayus can assemble

a reliable car like the Kelisa. In facts some 4/5 years ago

the Kelisa ranked better than a Smart made by a an associate

company of Daimler benz[1]

Just read about the John Terry and Anton Ferdinand affair.

Mas employs an irish fella and one Barrow who come fr Great Brittain

and their words are like gold in the corridors of power

at MAs and probably Khazanah.

note

[1] either reviewed in Car or Autocar 2006/7

.

.

.
Dicatat oleh di

Tiada ulasan:

Catat Ulasan

Langgan: Catat Ulasan (Atom)

Nuffnang