Rabu, 14 Disember 2011

Comments for Wee Choo Keong

Comments for Wee Choo Keong

Comment on MAS paid US$3.35 million under anti-trust law in US by Jamal

Posted: 14 Dec 2011 09:21 AM PST

Staff Only

It is no good to now say that everything in MAS was done without consultation. Dr Wafi as a professional should have stood his ground and resigned. To now state that his advice was not sought was a lame excuse. We in MAS know this Panamera dead wood too well. He is good in appointing lawyers and consultants. What is the point of having a person to head it when almost all matters were out sourced. Anybody could do the job of appointing outside consultants to do the job. An idiot can also do it.

Why stayed on to hold on to the post when one opinions have not been sought. Staying on under such circumstances, if it was true, amounted to gaji buta, no self respect and lack of professionalism.

The Panamera is more important than self respect and professionalism.

Comment on MAS paid US$3.35 million under anti-trust law in US by Suap the swap

Posted: 14 Dec 2011 08:11 AM PST

Well done, people. Keep the pressure on. Give MyCC more bullets

MyCC to probe MAS-AirAsia deal
December 14, 2011
The commission has received complaints from consumers about the pact.
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia Competition Commission (MyCC) will look into the share swap deal between Malaysian Airline System Bhd (MAS) and AirAsia Bhd when the Competition Act 2010 comes into effect Jan 1 next year.
Its chief executive officer, Shila Dorai Raj, said there were already complaints from consumers and they had urged MyCC to look into the deal and whether it would affect them.
"We have not seen the agreement yet but from our initial analysis, we think that there could be something.
"However, we're not sure because we really need to read the agreement to ensure there's an anti-competitive element.
"It's just from newspapers that we have done our own analysis.
"So far neither MAS nor AirAsia has submitted anything to MyCC," she told reporters after a CEO Business Luncheon with MyCC chairman, Siti Norma Yaakob, here today.
Shila said a lot of consumers were aware that MyCC would come into effect on Jan 1.
"Where consumers are concerned, they would become our priority. If there's a complaint, we will investigate and take action but it does not mean we will be pursuing every complaint.
"It has to be substantial for us to use our resources," she said.
On whether companies were ready for the Competition Act, Shila said that although the state of readiness could be relative, there's no reason for them not to be ready.
"We have given them ample time, about 18 months to get ready," she added.
-Bernama

Comment on MAS paid US$3.35 million under anti-trust law in US by Economist Kampong

Posted: 14 Dec 2011 08:08 AM PST

YB CK Wee

Please look into the matter of cross directorship in competing companies. Someone suggested – on another blog – this is specifically disallowed by the Companies Act of Malaysia 1965.

If this is so – then Tony and Din are in clear breach of the Companies Act 1965.

If this illegal act had been committed, then Khazanah and the 2 persons should do the necessary actions immediately or the ROC should take immediate actions to prosecute.

Please look into this.

Thanks YB and please continue with the EXCELLENT work you are doing.

Where will you be standing in the next election? I will be more than willing to campaign for you.

Very best regards

Comment on The MYCC “hush-hush” public meetings! by Kamal 2

Posted: 14 Dec 2011 08:01 AM PST

Ha ha guys, Kamal whacked you all and Tony got the blame. I like that.
If that ain’t ignorant, I really do not know what is.

Comment on MAS paid US$3.35 million under anti-trust law in US by Staff only

Posted: 14 Dec 2011 07:47 AM PST

Anonymous and flyguy, i am with you and yes, Dr. Wafi has done a great deeds for MAS despite some individual still trying hard to discredit him and his team. I work in MAS and I know how MAS is like suchlike decisions were all made first before consulting the rest. and that’s how MAS always get into trouble because the uneducated idiots above us are always thinking they’re the clever one..the uneducated above us is Khazanah Azman Bodoh.

Comment on Teks ucapan di Parlimen terhadap “Gang of Two” by Flyguy

Posted: 14 Dec 2011 07:43 AM PST

anti-kronisme

just a word of wisdom… never show ur stupidity in the public. how sure u r that u don’t get job in MAS cause u xdak saudara…. or the actual fact is u r not as good/brilliant as u may think….

i also don’t ado saudara with MAS, but GOD willing, with my experience and degree, i manage to land a job in MAS……

but, u don’t lose much…yesterday MAS is a very nice place to work and full of loyalty, that why even 10 years working in MAS, u still consider newbie. after 11th years, then u can say that u are org x brapa baru…after 20 years, baru u blh kata org lama

that is yesterday story…. now today staff moral has reach the lowest possible point and staff are start taking to change job…never happen in MAS…

myself….also reach lowest point and feel hopeless especially with new mgmt with their “syok sendiri” business plan.. and also plan to change company…

even i cabut from MAS, 1 thing for sure, MAS will has special place in my heart, as wise man said, “once an arliner, u r always an airliner”

Comment on MAS paid US$3.35 million under anti-trust law in US by Flyguy

Posted: 14 Dec 2011 07:09 AM PST

guys

can’t comment much on Dr Wafi but if u see the figure other airlines paid in anti-trust compared to MAS, u must give some credit to him, when the credit is due… all the breach that expose MAS to all anti-trust, u tot he knew ka??? he only knew when we need serve by court…

i have conversation with him last time and actually nothing he can do within his “salary scale” to prevent this CCF and suap deal. he alredi advice mgmt on this but if the top guy don’t want to listen, what on earth he can do????? what he can do now just a damage control and make sure the we don’t pay tooooooo much for this “drama tamil”

this game played by big white shark and beyond our wildest imagination. don’t take my word for it, but who is the broker/banker behind this arrangement ????????

even MYCC cleared MAS/AK, do u thing other countries like singapore, indon, EUR, US, Australia which already implement anti-trust earlier than Msia, will allow MAS/AK do whatever their pleased… stupid mistake my man..

but the sad thing is once MAS been penalise, the impact will be on staff… no more OT, not more bonus (BTW, we never get bonus for the past 8 years tenure myself with MAS. the highest boss was 2007 when MAS recorded RM 800++ M profit, staff get 1 month after kerja macam nak mampus) and things that MAS MD like to do…REDUCE STAFF… big boss mistake, staff yg tanggung :-(

just wait for few days and it will be a surprise announcement on our route rationalization but hold ur horses my man… this just 1st stage…

2nd stage it will have bigger SURPRISE.. for all the boom or doom…. just wait and see how this game played by THE MASTER….

YB Wee….

do u know that MAS have a paid adviser but it really unsurprised when this paid adviser huk hek pong tidak when MAS in crisis

u will do us a big favour if u can find a replacement killer…… opsss adviser to do what he/she suppose to do, which is ADVISE, not zzzzzzzzzzzzz

just my 2 cents

Comment on MAS paid US$3.35 million under anti-trust law in US by saga

Posted: 14 Dec 2011 06:30 AM PST

I am not sure whether you already know the information about the decision of changing the MAS logo colour to totally blue , the red part is to be eliminated because maybe Tony doesn't want the red to appear in MAS logo. What on earth is going on in his mind ? Perhaps he thinks red colour belongs exclusively to him only and his Air Asia outfit. There is a slight change in shape of the wau. Did AJ faithfully follow Tony's wish ? The MAS Board had already approved it. And so has the P.M. it seems. It is as though Tony has the sole prerogative to unilaterally decide on the change of the MAS logo which has been known to be MAS identity for so many years and it is so close to most Malaysians' hearts. MAS is one of Malaysia's strong brand names and I feel its not about what Tony likes or dislikes about the logo. The logo is MAS's identity, It's beautiful and the blue and red colour signify the colours of the Malaysian flag to appropriately reflect its status as a national carrier.
Another significant decision was on the cutting of routes. The implementation of this is catching us unaware. More routes are to be cut are:
Effective 6 January 2012 : Daily flights KL – Surabaya
Effective 10 January 2012 : Thrice weekly KL – Dubai
Effective 12 January 2012 : Twice weekly KL-Karachi-Dubai
Effective 13 January 2012 : Twice weekly KL-Dubai-Damman
Effective 30 January 2012 : Daily Langkawi-Penang-Singapore
Effective 31 January 2012 : Thrice weekly KL-Johannesburg
Effective 1 February 2012 : Thrice weekly KL-Cape Town-Buenos Aires
Effective 2 February 2012 : KL-Rome
Is this cutting of the routes benefiting Air Asia and Air Asia X?.
With the delivery of 200 aircrafts they will need routes that already have infrastructure and everything in place.

Comment on MAS paid US$3.35 million under anti-trust law in US by Anonymous

Posted: 14 Dec 2011 06:09 AM PST

Azmi MAS,

This is where I fear you have lost your objectivity. I think I wouldn’t be wrong if I were to say that it is usually the business users acted in violation of the law. Only after the act is done and the company gets caught, are corporate counsel like Dr Wafi, brought in to save the day. In the case of MAS, this happens despite the high state of awareness of the airline industry of anti-trust over the last few years and programs that was in place to educate the business users.

I posed a point for all of us to ponder in giving credit where it is due. Given the extremely low amount of out-of-court settlement, the counsel whoever he is and whatever car he drives, must be given credit. Keep in mind that the amount paid out is a small faction of the fines paid out by the other airlines. I shudder to think that MAS would have gone under if MAS had to pay the kind of fines paid by Korean Air or even British Air.

I put it that the real culprits in this case or as you put it incompetent deadwood are the business users who acted in violation of the law in the first place. Has action such as sacking as suggested by you, been taken against these perpetrators? Or have they been let off?

To MAS guy,

I do not believe Bain & Co was brought in to advise MAS on anti-trust laws. If I correctly read Dr Wafi’s email posted here previously, Bain & Co was brought in in order to become the arbiter in and auditer of the information being passed between MAS business users and the 2 board members who are also owners of Air Asia. I believe given the circumstances, letting an independent neutral party perform this function, is the best course of action. Dr Wafi could not have done this job because he is an interested party.

Dont let envy and the need to blame others make us blind to the truth.

Comment on MAS paid US$3.35 million under anti-trust law in US by Azmi MAS

Posted: 14 Dec 2011 05:23 AM PST

Anonymous @ 8:01 pm

You got to be joking. You are flatering Dr Wafi. Even he himself knew that he had done a poor job. If he did his job well, then MAS will not be the subject of complaint in the first place. We in MAS know better about Dr Wafi. He has a Panamera ok but performance of not even cubcai!
Dicatat oleh di

Tiada ulasan:

Catat Ulasan

Langgan: Catat Ulasan (Atom)

Nuffnang