Comments for Wee Choo Keong |
- Comment on Tan Sri Nor Yakop, Tan Sri Azman, Rashdan & Tan Sri Md Nor: Spare YAB PM, Please! by nazri
- Comment on Rashdan: Do you know about the RM50 ancillary charges imposed by the so called “No Frills” AirAsia by Randy
- Comment on Tan Sri Nor Yakop, Tan Sri Azman, Rashdan & Tan Sri Md Nor: Spare YAB PM, Please! by Pejuang MAS
- Comment on Tan Sri Nor Yakop, Tan Sri Azman, Rashdan & Tan Sri Md Nor: Spare YAB PM, Please! by weechookeong
- Comment on Tan Sri Nor Yakop, Tan Sri Azman, Rashdan & Tan Sri Md Nor: Spare YAB PM, Please! by The Con Man
- Comment on Tan Sri Nor Yakop, Tan Sri Azman, Rashdan & Tan Sri Md Nor: Spare YAB PM, Please! by Hashim
| Posted: 17 Sep 2011 04:18 AM PDT THis was one of the way that these f..kers have been helping MAS. How about the restrictions they have been putting on MAS regarding its fares so that it can’t compete with AA. No wonder MAS has made losses and then came the WAU and now share swap. Wo have they been helping? Now YB said it was Datuk Ibrahim bin Hj Ahmad. How come without Badawi at the back. May be he was shy of the name. Who wouldn’t? |
| Posted: 17 Sep 2011 03:38 AM PDT Fairy is correct abt what the convenience fee is about….and just to add to that – the rm50 ancillary charge is per pax per way…ie if you’re getting a return ticket, its rm 100……! |
| Posted: 16 Sep 2011 08:12 PM PDT Well done again, YB. Whack the sceptics too. Hoi tidor kah, kalau ilmu sejengkal jangan main di laut dalam. Ptuiii, these idiots never learn, ha. |
| Posted: 16 Sep 2011 07:59 PM PDT Hashim Thank you for your comments. If it was not profitable Datuk Ibrahim Hj Ahmad Badawi’s company (Gubahan Saujana Sdn Bhd) would not have bought 70% of MAS Catering Sdn Bhd. Since you know so much perhaps you should explain: 1. Since MAS catering was not doing: Gubahan Saujana Sdn Bhd was able to sell 51% of its 70% to Tamadam Bonded Warehouse Sdn Bhd for RM130 millions and 49% to LSG (a subsidiary of Lufthansa). Perhaps you can tell us all how much was the selling price of the 49%? 2. Why Tan Sri Md Nor did not annouce the back to back agreement that MAS must buy all its food supplies and cabin related services from MAS Catering (now LSG Sky Chefs Brahim) after the sale of its 70% share? 3. If this was not a one sided contract, please tell us why it was not one sided i.e. whether the prices of supplies are negotiable and what are hte safeguards in place in hte agreement that protect MAS. 4. No one in the right mind would have sold 70% MAS Catering. why sold to Gubahan Saujana Sdn Bhd? 4. What was the selling price of the 70 % share? 5. Why there was no open tender for the sale of the 70%? 6. If MAS Catering was doing so badly, do you think LSG (a subsidiary of Lufthansa) will be so stupid to buy 49% of the 70% of Gubahan”s share in MAS catering? Perhaps these questions are beyond you because you are just doing your job to put your comments. These are the questions Khazanah, YB Tan Sri Nor Yakob and Tan Sri Md Nor Md Yusof had to explain in Parliament this October. Anyway thank you very much for your attempt to do what you were trying to do. Let move on from you. October is not far away. Thank you. Have a good weekend for all. With kindest regards 5. Tell us what was the selling |
| Posted: 16 Sep 2011 07:21 PM PDT It is a scam in the first place. Tony needed MAS badly. Look at the announcement of the share swap on 8.8.2011. The beside the shares change they went straight to screw Firefly, which is making money. Firefly had to change name. Why Why WHy? Tony is scared of Firefly because Firefly is doing well and rakyat are plesed. AirAsia is doing well. My foot. From the day of its inception until now no dividen has been given to shareholders. AA ding well is a myth and everyday we are bombarded by press reports and press statement by this Tony. Put rofessional into MAS and no interference to stifle MAS tehn we will really see MAS flying high again. Look at MAS Catering. How the then managment under Md Nor, who is now the chairman, sold it to Datuk Ibrahim bin Hj Ahmad (Badawi) then entered into a back to back exclusive agreement that MAS must buy all its supplies from MAS Catering for 25 years. Why the exclusive agreement? Md Nor must explain why did he sell and why was it necessary to enter into the exclusive agreement for 25 years. This was how they screw MAS and then claimed that MAS had to be saved. MAS had to be saved form people like Md Nor, Azman Mokhtar and Tony. |
| Posted: 16 Sep 2011 10:02 AM PDT YB, I wish to point out that your claim that MCSB was profitable and contributing to the profits of MAS was wrong.Please check the audited accounts of MCSB prior to the sale. The sale of 70% realised cash for MAS to assist in its turnaround. The Concession was given to ensure that the purchasers has an opportunity to obtain a fair return of its investment from the support of the concession revenue. Subsequently, the new managed entity made profits and dividends were paid to MAS. I fear you were misinformed and I believe your conclusions are unfair since its based on disinformation. I do not wish to support any party but the facts must be revealed not on mere heresay. |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Comments for Wee Choo Keong To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
Tiada ulasan:
Catat Ulasan