Comments for Wee Choo Keong |
- Comment on Does AirAsia deserve to be the “Golden Child” / “Ibarat Anak Mas”? by Anonymous
- Comment on Maybank Investment bought 19.5 million shares of AirAsia X to stabilise the IPO price by Anonymous
- Comment on Maybank Investment bought 19.5 million shares of AirAsia X to stabilise the IPO price by D-Kasi
- Comment on Maybank Investment bought 19.5 million shares of AirAsia X to stabilise the IPO price by Sham
- Comment on Maybank Investment bought 19.5 million shares of AirAsia X to stabilise the IPO price by Shameless Sidhu
- Comment on Does AirAsia deserve to be the “Golden Child” / “Ibarat Anak Mas”? by Petronius
| Comment on Does AirAsia deserve to be the “Golden Child” / “Ibarat Anak Mas”? by Anonymous Posted: 14 Jul 2013 08:57 AM PDT what nonsense is this ? AirAsia and star newspaper write saying “”"passengers waiting in airports on account of KLIA2 delay”"”"”" what nonsense is the CEO crying out about delay in KLIA2 ………am sure they are the contributors to the delay and now BULLYING the government….. |
| Posted: 14 Jul 2013 08:48 AM PDT Such dubious, writers who fabricate forecast on unknown fundamentals must be chronies of the fat corporate arses. Sidhu singh Katara Bengakal would you invest your home and oldage savings in Air Asia xyz…… Come on lets see you put your money where your sick mouth is |
| Posted: 14 Jul 2013 08:02 AM PDT |
| Posted: 14 Jul 2013 07:07 AM PDT She called herself a journalist and deputy editor of Business Star. She must be too stupid to realize that the readers could see through her. She is just a junkyard reporter fit for the gutter. |
| Posted: 13 Jul 2013 08:08 PM PDT Now Everyone Can Con with poor standard of journalism. Shame on you Sidhu. You better come out with another piece based on sources that your sources story was based on “bullshit” as you are just a mercenary journalist. |
| Comment on Does AirAsia deserve to be the “Golden Child” / “Ibarat Anak Mas”? by Petronius Posted: 13 Jul 2013 06:55 PM PDT So, what new light did the Deputy Transport Minister shed on the KLIA2 imbroglio? Apart from showing that MAHB may be a “toothless” tiger in being unable to “freeze” the specs for KLIA2 before work on the project commenced. Compare this to what’s happening for the new Terminal 4 at Singapore Changi Airport. According to reports, CAG (Changi Airport Group) had intensive discussions with ALL stakeholders (airlines, ground handlers, retailers, F&B operators, police, customs, immigration, ground transport operators etc) to understand their wishes and requirements before the specs for Terminal 4 were drawn up, agreed and “frozen”. Can MAHB state categorically that it also did all of the above for KLIA2? |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Comments for Wee Choo Keong To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
Tiada ulasan:
Catat Ulasan