Khamis, 29 November 2012

Comments for Wee Choo Keong

Comments for Wee Choo Keong

Comment on NOW EVERYONE CAN SUE & BE COMPENSATED FOR FLIGHT DELAY by Average Joe

Posted: 29 Nov 2012 03:49 AM PST

What a CHEAP mentality. there you go!

Comment on Passengers are now able to claim compensation for delayed flights of more than 3 hours by Average Joe

Posted: 29 Nov 2012 03:33 AM PST

We can do even WITHOUT getting that CAA ruling applicable in Malaysia. Do not ever forget the June 13 landmark decision by the Consumer Claims Tribunal involving a case of ridiculous flight delay:

http://weechookeong.wordpress.com/2012/06/15/now-everyone-can-sue-compensated-for-flight-delay/

Apart from this landmark decision, in most cases the airlines would still get away due to the customer’s own attitude, gullibility and lack of awareness on consumer rights.

I’m sorry that your hope of seeing everyone keep quiet for long is now dashed, Poseidon’s Spear. However, let me recommend a perfect place where you can have everyone else silent. The morgue in any nearby General Hospital will suit you very well.

Thank you.

Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by Poseidon's Spear

Posted: 29 Nov 2012 02:04 AM PST

Ronald

Which airline is not interested in making profits or being consistently profitable?

Witness the wailing and weeping over MAS’s financial travails which started – wait for it – before AirAsia appeared on the scene.

Or why is it ok for the likes of Ryanair, Jetstar, Southwest Airlines etc to make profits, but not for AirAsia?

Maybe it’s because these other airlines are run by farang gweilos, but AirAsia is being run by an uppity Indian who has to be taught a lesson or two by his betters.

Comment on Passengers are now able to claim compensation for delayed flights of more than 3 hours by Poseidon's Spear

Posted: 29 Nov 2012 12:25 AM PST

After the Gman made his usual trenchant observations on this topic, the others who had voiced opinions suddenly went quiet.

Way to go, Gm an!

Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by Ronald

Posted: 28 Nov 2012 11:52 PM PST

Safety measures cost MONEY! NOW EVERYONE SHOULD BE CAUTIOUS, When an airline is only interested in PROFITS, PROFITS and PROFITS. Hidden charges all over. Hope that the pariah’s cybertroopers understand this fact.

Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by Poseidon's Spear

Posted: 28 Nov 2012 11:46 PM PST

“shook sender”??? Surely you don’t mean “syiok sendiri”, do you?

Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by Daud

Posted: 28 Nov 2012 07:17 PM PST

There shuld be a thorough investigation in the DCA by MACC before any air tragedy. If it is in UK or other country, AirAsia would have to be grounded upon discovery of non compliance with safety regulations. DCA officers are more interested to go on a joy ride than to ensure all safety rules are strictly adhered to by airlines. A good example is that stupid DCA officer Captain Sumali who was more interested in piloting the A380. Another shook sender. Captain Sumali should be face disciplinary actions. Piloting a plane is not his function.

Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by Pak Zawi

Posted: 28 Nov 2012 07:05 PM PST

6 months is the threshold period when the oldest planes are due for heavy maintenance. Any period after that is deemed as beyond the safety limit. Nobody in their right mind will let their flesh and blood fly an aircraft beyond that period.

Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by The Gooberman

Posted: 28 Nov 2012 05:54 PM PST

Pak Joe

Why are you not answering P Spear’s straightforward question: “are you saying that the DCA has deliberately “fudged” the issue as far as AirAsia’s safety record is concerned”?

Are you scared to put your response to this question on record?

Answer that and we can debate further.
Dicatat oleh di

Tiada ulasan:

Catat Ulasan

Langgan: Catat Ulasan (Atom)

Nuffnang