Selasa, 22 Mei 2012

Comments for Wee Choo Keong

Comments for Wee Choo Keong


Comment on Little Napoleons in Khazanah & MAS withheld BinaFikir’s fees from Parliament by Kps

Posted: 22 May 2012 09:11 AM PDT

YB,u r a true blue wakil rakyat,every wakil rakyat should look up to you and if they can’t follow ur style pls ask the PM not to nominate u for the next GE13,YB Wee Choo Keong,u hv my vote any day.Keep on fighting the bloody nation robbers until they go back to the TF Pariah where they belong and bring ur chief TS Nooor who is a bloody Tamil.and also.a.pariah from the era of sleepy head with u.U muka x malu robbers,berambuslah dari MAS kesayangan negara.U shud spend the rest of ur life in jail for commiting an act of treason against Malaysia.SPRM should imvestigate them and their families where they stashed their ill gotten gain.Buru mereka sehingga ke lubang cacing sekali pun.

Comment on Little Napoleons in Khazanah & MAS withheld BinaFikir’s fees from Parliament by SP

Posted: 22 May 2012 07:22 AM PDT

dunno what nda they signed YB but the standard ones usually say information can be disclosed as required by the authorities… so if the Parliament is not the authority i dont know what is to them

Comment on Little Napoleons in Khazanah & MAS withheld BinaFikir’s fees from Parliament by weechookeong

Posted: 22 May 2012 05:13 AM PDT

Hanana bt Abdullah

Sdri, thank you very much for your advice. It is very helpful to me. I will definitely raise in parliament about the bina tak fikir lots.

Thank you

with kindest regards

wee choo keong

Comment on Little Napoleons in Khazanah & MAS withheld BinaFikir’s fees from Parliament by HANANA BT ABDULLA

Posted: 22 May 2012 05:00 AM PDT

:

.

.
.

;

;

Y/b
,

I probabbly can contribute some input

thru my experience in futures trading

to help u understand ‘hedging’ so that

u could rasie interesting questions in

parliament.

Say the fuel prices are fluctuating because

of some changes in the political situation

in the oil producing countries or threat of a war appears,

Other than these situations actually arising, oil

prices are boringly predictable. Look at the

charts in
,

http://www.bloomberg.com/quote/JET1NECC:IND

,

The prices of jetfuel go up and down from

a period of half a month to a period of 3 months

From this graph [only as illustration- I have

no motivation to study the actual graphs] made

a simple inference- prices can continue to come

down in 1/2 month , 2 months or even possibly 3 months,

,

,
Because oil is traded every working [us] day, trade

will be done on a working day basis. You could ask

how MAS how they buy their jet fuel- do they buy directly

from brokers or get some agents to deal with the

brokers?
,

,

How many days stocks do MAS buy?

,

,
Supoose MAS requires 500 million litres of fuel, what

is their stock level -1 month, 2 months or 3 months.

Surely it would be fishy if their stock level is 12 months.
,

,

If price cycles are are within 1/2 month to 3 months , why would u want

to buy fuel for 12 months.
,

,

Simple Purchase policy
————————
,,

If Co buys oil according to standard industry practice

it is unlikely that Mas would have outstanding losses.

,

,

In practice if Mas buys a 3 month future based on the middle

line the Co would have savings and losses in alternate cycles

and there would be minimal losses or even some gain by the end of

the accounting period.

,

,

It is strange that Mas can loose big because trading is done

[in theory] daily. Supoose Co buys a future at t=0 futures for

t+90 fuel at 100 , and at t+30 thinks price is going to drop, then

Co can cut loss and make a sale for the t+90 at a rate that can

unload the contract at that time. In practice the gains and

the losses would even out unless agents speculate on the price.
,

,

This would be gambling.
,

,

Example
——-

If at t=0 MAS bought a future oil delivery t+90 , 500 million

litres instead of a 3 month supply [approx 125 million liters]

then it is an unnecessary and unwise gambling. If this happen

I would reccomend that you pursue a serious financial misdemeanour

charge on the agent/(s).

As a parting shot, more news from the grapevine so that

we can analyse. Try provide these data that I have raised

,

,

,

Comment on Little Napoleons in Khazanah & MAS withheld BinaFikir’s fees from Parliament by Yazid of Khzanah

Posted: 22 May 2012 04:30 AM PDT

When Amok became the MD of Khazanah BinaFikir seemed to get a lot of work from GLCs. Very coincidental. YB should ask how much Tenaga paid Bina tak Fikir Nanny Danny for the rubbish in 2005. I thought that Yenaga had their own experts and yet they need to hire Bina Tak Fikir.

We should not forget that mamat Tan Sri Nor Yakop. He is the one that is instrumental in getting Amok into Khazanah and a lot of other things.

Comment on Little Napoleons in Khazanah & MAS withheld BinaFikir’s fees from Parliament by Rhyu T

Posted: 22 May 2012 03:53 AM PDT

The fee was RM1m plus, chicken feed compared to McKinsey, and BCG. Done I’ve spilled the bean

Comment on TO SAVE MAS AJ, Rashdan, Shane Nollan, Rozman, Azhari, Datuk Azman Yahya, Datuk Rohana & others must be OUT by triobangang

Posted: 22 May 2012 03:11 AM PDT

Last year the same month, they blamed Sari Bernard for under performing that caused Mas not performing. He was asked to leave. Then Tengku Azmil become the next victim. Same story they were under perform and they need to leave. Same goes to Bod.

But why not the same treatment to the current management. Are they performing?

Comment on Little Napoleons in Khazanah & MAS withheld BinaFikir’s fees from Parliament by Min

Posted: 22 May 2012 03:00 AM PDT

Y.B Malaysia will be a better place if more MP are like you.

Comment on Little Napoleons in Khazanah & MAS withheld BinaFikir’s fees from Parliament by hamid

Posted: 22 May 2012 02:45 AM PDT

Fuel hedging boo2x was solely the work of Idris Jala and
poor Tg Azmil had to bear the brunt of this poor judgement.
Idris Jala hedged fuel prices at US$100 and the market collapsed
sending oil prices spiralling to US$80. Now you know why Idris Jala
jumped ship the moment he was offered a post in the govt.
IJ should be answerable for making that bad call.

Comment on TM UniFi “D-Link router only can do” – another TM monopolistic policy that raises suspicion! by weechookeong

Posted: 22 May 2012 02:23 AM PDT

Lay Hong

Thank you for your comments.

Can post your telephone number in the comment and I will call you. It is easier to resolve the problems via the telephone. Please don’t worry. Your phone number will not be published.

Thank you

Regards

wee choo keong

Tiada ulasan:

Nuffnang