Jumaat, 25 November 2011

Comments for Wee Choo Keong

Comments for Wee Choo Keong

Comment on MH = “MARUAH HILANG” & “MUSNAH HARAPAN”! by weechookeong

Posted: 25 Nov 2011 04:15 AM PST

Anak Malaysia, Olek skilganon and others

I really am sorry didn’t have the time to approve the comments because of the PSC on Electoral Reform public hearing in Kota Kinabalu for 25 & 26 Nov. The public hearing finished at 5:30 pm and the PSC on Electoral Reform went on to deliberate what have been brought up and the contents of the interim reports that the PSC is going to table in Parliament on 1-12-2011. We have finished our meeting at 8:00 pm just now.

Thank you for your kind understanding.

With kindest regards

Wee choo keong

Comment on MH = “MARUAH HILANG” & “MUSNAH HARAPAN”! by Anak Malaysia

Posted: 25 Nov 2011 02:22 AM PST

I totally agreed with what you said KUNYIT HIDUP. So many questions been put forward by the members to the Union but none been answered.

Below is a statement that was published in http://www.btimes.com.my which I find it so ridiculous, pse refer below:-

“The government today reiterated its stand that the Comprehensive Collaboration Framework signed between Malaysia Airlines (MAS) and AirAsia which brought about the exchange of shares between the two, was part of the plan to recover MAS.
Deputy Transport Minister Datuk Abdul Rahim Bakri said
the move has given a new lease of life to MAS to carry on with its operations after having suffered major losses”.

Read more: ‘AirAsia pact gives MAS new lease of life’ http://www.btimes.com.my/articles/20111114230858/Article/#ixzz1ei6sqDN4

IS the DTM trying to say that without AA…MAS will not survived and is he also trying to say that without AA….MAS will suffered even more losses?

If the bloody Pariah TF is really trying to help MAS survived then he wouldn’t have asked his bloody running dog Rashdan to fly yo London and sign the home jersey with QPR for RM18 Million and also to cut MAS profitable routes and cancelled flights which was fully booked a few days before Hari Raya.

Please WAKE UP DTM….can’t you see that the Pariah TF is sucking MAS dry, like the Malay saying….Lepas habis hisap madu…sepah dibuang.

Comment on MH = “MARUAH HILANG” & “MUSNAH HARAPAN”! by Olek Skilgannon

Posted: 25 Nov 2011 12:27 AM PST

Here are some other facts for the MAS unions and MAS loyalists to consider:

- the impending onset of the Asean Open Skies Agreement in 2015 when Asean airlines will be allowed to operate freely, without any restrictions, between Asean capital cities. Every airline will want to fly to Changi because it has the biggest pool of transit traffic and business travellers in the region. What will happen to KLIA? As it is, all the Malaysia-based airlines (MAS, AirAsia and Firefly) operate numerous flights from Malaysian cities to Changi. Will Malaysians prefer to fly to Changi, transit there and board a flight to an international destination, given Changi’s better international connectivity and choice of airlines?

- the opening up of China and India. Currently, there are more weekly flights from Chinese and Indian cities to Changi than there are to KLIA, and Changi is served by more Chinese and Indian airlines than is KLIA. How will MAS compete in this environment when its a poor second-best or third-best in transit traffic and business travel?

- the inexorable rise of jet fuel prices will pressure Asean (and Asian) airlines to rapidly replace their fleets with more fuel-efficient aircraft (A320neo, B737 Max, B777, A350, B787 and A380). MAS has to do likewise or be relegated to the sidelines as other airlines bring in more modern and fuel-efficient fleets. Where is MAS going to get the money for this? Float bonds in the current inhospitable financial environment? Ask the government for a handout or another bailout?

- the rise of mega hub airports in the Gulf (Dubai and Qatar) and well-funded Gulf airlines (Emirates, Qatar Airways and Etihad) that can maximise the geographical advantage of these airports to funnel traffic from the US and Europe to Asia and Australia? How can MAS (and KLIA) compete in this big-bucks game?

Like I said previously, we ignore the financials at our periil! And its not resolving the real issue of costs and competitiveness by waffling on about “national service” and rural or sub-profitable domestic air routes. Who is going to pay the piper in the final analysis?

Mr Wee – you write good, but you seemingly ignore the facts and realities in the airline industry.

And the fact that the Malaysian government is no longer in a position to offer an open-ended cheque book to MAS, political considerations notwithstanding.

Comment on MH = “MARUAH HILANG” & “MUSNAH HARAPAN”! by Olek Skilgannon

Posted: 24 Nov 2011 11:59 PM PST

If we subscribe to the notion that the Skytrax airline rankings are biassed and open to question, let’s consider some other sources of airline rankings.

The well-regarded US travel magazine, Travel + Leisure, does an annual ranking of the world’s best airlines, hotels, resorts etc. In October 2011, it published the 2011 World’s Best Airlines rankings, which are as follows (top 15):

(1) SIA (2) Emirates (3) Etihad Airways (4) Air New Zealand (5) Virgin America
(6) Virgin Atlantic (7) Cathay Pacific (8) All Nippon Airways (9) Korean Air (10) Thai International (11) Qatar Airways (12) Finnair (13) Asiana Airlines (14) Air Tahiti Nui (15) Japan Airlines

Mana MAS? Missing in action?

In hindsight, it should not be too much of a surprise, seeing as how MAS has virtually given up on the US market, leaving LAX (Los Angeles) as it’s only destination in North America. Which is ironic, because the Malaysian government is chasing US investors and FDI, yet American business executives have to fly to KL via Singapore’s Changi Airport or Hong Kong.

Why can’t MAS make profits on its flights to the US, when SIA can run full loads from Changi to LAX, San Francisco, New York (JFK and Newark) and Houston, even to the extent of operating all-Business Class non-stop flights from Changi to LAX and New York (Newark)?

Are we missing something here?

And if we think that SIA’s premier rankings are mere flukes, here’s what the airline has to say about itself (no false modesty for SIA!): the Business Traveller (Asia Pacific) magazine in September 2011 ranked SIA as Best Airline (for the 20th consecutive year), Best Asia-Pacific Airline, Best First Class, Best Business Class and Best Economy Class.

Again, I ask – mana MAS? Even in the Asia-Pacific region, cannot be Best Airline, is it? No matter that Malaysians form a fair proportion of SIA’s pilots, tech crew, cabin crew and engineering staff. Same racial mix, but different performance standards?

MAS staff unions – can you please explain this apparent anomaly?

Comment on Singaporeans & Africans misused of Social Pass / Student Visa will face fine, imprisonment and/or deportation by mrazuar@yahoo.com

Posted: 24 Nov 2011 08:35 PM PST

Menteri diatas sekadar bercakap sahaja.pada hakikat tidak berbuat apa2 yang menyakinkan rakyat bahawa apa sahaja yang dibebelkan olih menteri diatas benar2 ujud.Ini adalah jawapan yang di ulang ulang setiap kali timbul isu2 baru berkenaan kebanjiran warga asing khususnya yang melibatkan aktiviti jenayah.

Kita kerap menyaksikan aksi2 melampau terutamanya warga dari Afrika yang bersikap besar kepala dengan penduduk2 dikejiranan tempat mereka menyewa.Mabuk dan melakukan aktiviti ridak bermoral bahkan jika cuba ditegur mereka akan memberontak dan mengkasari penduduk setempat.

Saya pernah melihat seorang warga Afrika yang berbadan besar mengganggu seorang isteri rakyat tempatan didepan suami wanita iru sendiri dengan meminta diberikan no tali[on dimana apabila ditegur olih sang suami warga Afrika itu cuba mengkasari suami wanita tersebut.

Kerajaan dilihat cuba untuk mendapatkan kredit diperingkat dunia antarabangsa dengan diakui negara yang amat maju disegi pendidikan akedemik dan mesra alam sejagat dengan menaja pembelajaran warga2 Afrika yang kurang ajar tetapi rakyat sendiri yang hidup merempat tidak mampu untuk belajar dikolej2 swasta yang sesetengah warga Afrika tadi di taja olih kerajaan.

Kolej2 swasta pula mengambil kesempatan dengan mempromosi kursus2 yang mereka ada dan sesetengahnya tidak diiktiraf pun diperingkat antarabangsa dengan mempermudahkan syarat2 kemasukkan ke kolej dan seteusnya melobi jabatan2 kerajaan berkaitan untuk mempermudahkan pengeluaran dokumen2 seperti pas pelajar yang dimaksudkan menteri diatas.

Kerajaan sepatutnya menguatkuasakan undang2 dimana pihak kolej diwajibkan menyediakan asrama untuk pelajar2 ini dan mereka dipertanggungjawapkan untuk memastikan pelajar2 ini tidak melakukan sesuatu yang melanggar syarat2 PAS pelajar yang diberikan..Cara yang diamalkan olih agensi2 pekerjaan asing yang menyediakan asrama dan mengawal pergerakkan pekerja2 kontrak ini wajar diterapkan untuk pelajar2 asing dikolej2 swasta.

Apa yang dinyatakan berkenaan sistem2 canggih olih menteri diatas memanglah ujud tetapi kita mempersoalkan benarkah sistem2 yang ada dilaksanakan sepenuhnya atau berlaku ketirisan diperingkat agensi2 tertentu yang mengenadalikannya

.Kerajaan tidak perlu untuk menjadi popular dikalangan negara2 Afrika dengan membuka pintu negara seluas2nya kepada warga2 asing khasnya warga Afrika yang akhirnya rakyat sendiri mendapat kecelakaan walaupun kerajaan menganggap ia kes terpencil tetapi kerajaan sepatutunya dipertanggungjawapkan disegi perundangan kerana rakyat adalah pembayar cukai yang mewajibkan keselamatan diri mereka dilindungi oilh kerajaan.
Dicatat oleh di

Tiada ulasan:

Catat Ulasan

Langgan: Catat Ulasan (Atom)

Nuffnang