Rabu, 12 Oktober 2011

念群与沙登人民同在 | Nie Ching for Serdang

念群与沙登人民同在 | Nie Ching for Serdang

[Oct 5] Dialog polis bersama penduduk-penduduk di Tmn Universiti Indah

Posted: 12 Oct 2011 08:38 AM PDT

DIALOG SAUDARI TEO NIE CHING BERSAMA PIHAK POLIS SERTA PENDUDUK-PENDUDUK TAMAN UNIVERSITI INDAH, SERI KEMBANGAN

Tempat : Balai Masyarakat MPSJ, Jalan Indah 3, Taman Universiti Indah

Tarikh :  05-10-2011

Masa :  8.30 - 11.00 malam

Kehadiran :  Ahli Parlimen Serdang Saudari Teo Nie Ching, Ketua Balai Polis Seri Kembangan Tuan Chai Chee Boon,  Ahli Majlis MPSJ Encik Tai Cheng Heng dan anggota-anggota lain.

Pihak Penganjur:  JKP MPSJ Zon 21, Persatuan Perayaan Yeelan Serdang Selangor

史里肯邦安警局长蔡志文（左2）欢迎居民若有任何投诉和疑问，可出席警方会客日，反映问题。左为林高浓右起为奥斯曼、穆因、戴禎兴和张念群。（图：星洲日报）

当被问及谁家曾遭匪徒破门行窃时，逾10名出席警民对话会的居民纷纷举起手。（图：星洲日报）

相关新闻

【星洲日报】2个月10窃案居民忧‧警局长：装闭路电视加强监控

【中国报】沙登大学岭警民对话会 · 警长授招防罪案 开启汽车防盗可退贼

Perjumpaan Pusat Perkhidmatan DAP Serdang yang diketuai oleh YB Teo Nie Ching dan pihak polis bersama penduduk Taman Universiti Indah telah banyak menyelesaikan isu-isu keselamatan dan kes-kes jenayah,kecurian yang telah diadukan kepada beliau.

(More......)

【独立新闻在线】反贪委耗24万聘法医律师 . 张念群抨花销高肃贪力弱

Posted: 12 Oct 2011 07:25 AM PDT

Click here for the English version of this blog post

反贪污委员会在赵明福命案中，耗费逾24万元聘请英国法医和本地著名律师，民主行动党雪州副组织秘书兼沙登国会议员张念群指出，领取逾二亿元庞大经费的反贪委并没有交出令人满意的成绩单，其定罪率只达73%，较香港、新加坡、印尼逊色。 

张 念群指出，上周三她在国会提问首相，反贪污委员会聘请英国著名法医彼得维纳兹（Peter Vanezis）和代表律师莫哈末沙菲宜（Datuk Seri Muhamad Shafee Abdullah，右图左）的花费，根据首相署部长纳兹里的书面回答，反贪委聘请英国著名法医彼得维纳兹的费用，包括机票、住宿、饮食、交通和专业费，一 共是9万680元，雇用沙菲宜的律师费更是高达15万元。

张念群说：“法医和律师都是专业、精深的学问，彼得维纳兹法医和沙菲宜律师收取服务费也是无可厚非。然而，这就更加凸显了泰国著名法医庞缇和赵家代表律师卡巴星与哥宾星的难能可贵。”

她说，为了协助找出赵明福的死因，庞缇四度来马，先后在死因调查庭和皇委会上供证，也参与了二度验尸。可是，却没有收取过半分专业费用，可谓良心的工作者。

“赵家代表律师卡巴星与哥宾星更是从2009年就一直为赵家据理力争，从一开始的验尸庭，到还在进行中的司法审核，长达三年的时间，卡巴星父子也是全然义务的为赵家伸张正义。”

反贪委开销高定罪率低

张念群指出，反贪委2010年和2011年的行政开销分别是1亿6800万元和2亿200万元，明年的行政拨款更是高达2亿1100万元，支付彼得维纳兹法医和沙菲宜律师不低的服务费当然不成问题，可是，在领取了庞大的经费后，人民有权要求反贪会交出让人满意的成绩单。

她说，相较于印尼接近100%、新加坡85%及香港则是95%的定罪率，马来西亚贪污案件定罪率只有73%，明显弱人一截。

(More......)

MACC track record poor, public confidence low

Posted: 12 Oct 2011 07:21 AM PDT

Last Wednesday, I questioned the Prime Minister in Parliament about the expenses incurred by the MACC in hiring:

1.     The famous forensic expert from England, Peter Vanezis; and

2.     Representing solicitor Datuk Seri Muhamad Shafee Abdullah

According to the written reply from the Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Nazri Aziz, the total expenditure incurred by MACC for Peter Vanezis, including air fare, accommodation, food and beverage, transportation and professional fees, amounted to RM90,680; whereas the professional fees paid to Datuk Seri Muhamad Shafee Abdullah was RM150,000.

Without a doubt, forensics and law are both highly specialised and complicated fields hence Professor Dr. Peter Vanezis and Datuk Seri Muhamad Shafee Abdullah can justify their high consultation fees. In light of that, their high charges make the voluntary and selfless contributions by renowned Thai forensic expert Dr Pornthip Rojanasunand and the solicitors representing the Teoh family, Karpal Singh and Gobind Singh, stand out even more. Their invaluable contributions are testament to their commitment and outstanding integrity.

In order to seek truth and justice, Dr. Pornthip came to Malaysia 4 times to testify in the coroner’s court and the Royal Commission of Inquiry, and participated in the 2nd autopsy on Teoh Beng Hock's remains. For all her efforts, she did not charge a single cent for her professional services because she is driven by her conscience.

Both Karpal Singh and Gobind Singh have been fighting on behalf of the Teoh family in court since 2009, from the coroner’s court to the current ongoing appeal and judicial review – a period of three long, painstaking years. The father-and-son team is also fighting for justice for the Teoh family on a completely pro bono basis.

The operating expenditure for the MACC for 2010 and 2011 amounted to RM168 million and RM202 million respectively, and the federal allocation for 2012 has been increased to a whopping RM211 million. Therefore, the high fees charged by Peter Vanezis and Datuk Seri Muhamad Shafee Abdullah are not a big deal for the MACC.

However, seeing as a huge amount of taxpayers’ money has been spent by the MACC, it is only right that the people demand a satisfactory performance from the anti-corruption institution. Compared to conviction rates of almost 100% in Indonesia, 85% in Singapore and 95% in Hong Kong, the conviction rate in Malaysia is a pathetic 73% -- a poor track record when compared with its peers in the region.  

(More......)
Dicatat oleh di

Tiada ulasan:

Catat Ulasan

Langgan: Catat Ulasan (Atom)

Nuffnang