Comments for Wee Choo Keong

Posted by Awanama | Posted on 1:16 PTG

Comments for Wee Choo Keong

Comment on HAZE: Palanivel to ask Indo Environment Minister “Why Indo did not institute the US$225 billion civil suit against Asia Pulp & Paper and APRIL in 2007?” by Anonymous

Posted: 26 Jun 2013 09:30 PM PDT

Fully agreed with Guna.. Indonesian government should have just heavily penalise the plantation culprits regardless who own them..or perhaps some “arrangement” have been made. Dare not speculate!

Comment on Anymore of the like of “Al-Ishal Ishak” left in MAS? by jack1960

Posted: 26 Jun 2013 07:57 PM PDT

Whatever remnants of planted key personnel or ex-consultants still in the employment of MAS have to pull their weight for the benefit of the national carrier, the nation & all Malaysians. Witch hunts are irrelevant now, its survival & growth time. The BOD & AJ has to make do with each & everyone of the MAS workforce.

However, intense public scrutiny through all avenues including YB’s blog MUST CONTINUE as some sort of a check and balance.

To me, whatever is within the control of the BOD must be further enhanced and not compromised by unnecessary political pressure, within reason & logic. Catering needs to be improved & costs re-looked in earnest, if asset unbundling could be undertaken before, why not unwinding a totally lop-sided agreement. Engineering must not to compromised and must stay in-house for control. Privatizing is not a wise choice.

Lastly, MAS personnel was and is not without talent, key is to find (& quickly) a management style to release the latent talents (& experience) available. Just look at the demand by other carriers of former MAS staff. The last decade of external consultant led turnaround teams have little to show for it vis-a-vis the RM millions spent to hire them.

Comments posted (0)