Comments for Wee Choo Keong |
- Comment on DCA failed to withdraw the AOC of FAX / AirAsia X in 2007 (Part 3) by jack1960
- Comment on DCA failed to withdraw the AOC of FAX / AirAsia X in 2007 (Part 3) by Anonymnous
- Comment on DCA failed to withdraw the AOC of FAX / AirAsia X in 2007 (Part 2) by Mas Malindo
- Comment on DCA failed to withdraw the AOC of FAX / AirAsia X in 2007 (Part 3) by Habib
- Comment on DCA failed to withdraw the AOC of FAX / AirAsia X in 2007 (Part 2) by George
- Comment on DCA failed to withdraw the AOC of FAX / AirAsia X in 2007 (Part 2) by Wei
- Comment on DCA failed to withdraw the AOC of FAX / AirAsia X in 2007 (Part 2) by fazli
- Comment on DCA failed to withdraw the AOC of FAX / AirAsia X in 2007 (Part 2) by hanana bt abdulla
- Comment on DCA failed to withdraw the AOC of FAX / AirAsia X in 2007 (Part 2) by Jozan
- Comment on DCA failed to withdraw the AOC of FAX / AirAsia X in 2007 (Part 2) by Amir
| Comment on DCA failed to withdraw the AOC of FAX / AirAsia X in 2007 (Part 3) by jack1960 Posted: 11 Jan 2013 08:19 AM PST No short cuts in transport business Regardless of the maintenence program, in-house, out-source or “outhouse”, an orderly system is required, constantly updated & consistently adhered to, without exception. It requires carefully planned investment, no matter LCC or full-service model. This is the heart & soul of the company. The profitibility depends on it but more importantly, lives depend on it. Zero or full-fare, the aircraft must be able to complete its flight in one piece. The DCA as the steward to the aviation industry must apply the highest standards, firm & fair to all , without compromise. Its actions, the standard it sets, will instill confidence in our civil aviation industry, at home & abroad. The DCA already has a good reputation, why has this been compromise? There’s never any justification, for loss of lives. Vested interests or political hegemony has & still is a bain to the transport industry in the country, land, sea or air. We may have been very lucky so far, but for how long. There have & are good practices being followed, don’t let these go to waste just because of greed. BTW, we haven’t even talked about the technical crews, cabin crews, ground handlers etc. If history have shown that Malaysians are sought after be it in maintenence, technical & cabin crews etc, the DCA must have done it right before. WHY CHANGE? |
| Comment on DCA failed to withdraw the AOC of FAX / AirAsia X in 2007 (Part 3) by Anonymnous Posted: 11 Jan 2013 06:27 AM PST 41 parts of the aircraft have been canabalized by FAX/AirAsia X! DCA officers what have you been doing? Yet, the Sleepy Head allowed it to keep the subsidy of RM250 million for the RAS. the Sleepy Head should be shot. |
| Comment on DCA failed to withdraw the AOC of FAX / AirAsia X in 2007 (Part 2) by Mas Malindo Posted: 11 Jan 2013 05:45 AM PST What nonsense are you talking about hanana? All these happened during Pak Lah’s time, not Mahathir’s. You are at the wrong site dear.. Go and express yourself at malaysiakini or similar anti establishment sites. We are opining technical irregularities of an airline. |
| Comment on DCA failed to withdraw the AOC of FAX / AirAsia X in 2007 (Part 3) by Habib Posted: 11 Jan 2013 04:09 AM PST Suddenly the Pariah was so quiet. May be the evidence posted in YB’s blog was too painful to his low caste eyes. Ka! Ka! Ka! |
| Comment on DCA failed to withdraw the AOC of FAX / AirAsia X in 2007 (Part 2) by George Posted: 10 Jan 2013 08:03 PM PST If the aircraft have not been maintained according to the regulation at that time, I believe the present fleet of AirAsia X had to be in a similar situation. Best of luck to the passengers of AirAsia X. |
| Comment on DCA failed to withdraw the AOC of FAX / AirAsia X in 2007 (Part 2) by Wei Posted: 10 Jan 2013 07:40 PM PST 58 parts have been cannibalized! That was the standard of safety for AirAsia. was it normal for an airline to cannibalize so many parts for spare parts and there were so many aircraft grounded for similar purposes? This aircraft has been grounded for so may months without replacement of the cannibalized parts. This must be the business model of AirAsia! |
| Comment on DCA failed to withdraw the AOC of FAX / AirAsia X in 2007 (Part 2) by fazli Posted: 10 Jan 2013 07:21 PM PST What a scam? How could DCA allowed AirAsia X to carry on with the AOC with such records? Harapkan pager pager makan paid. |
| Comment on DCA failed to withdraw the AOC of FAX / AirAsia X in 2007 (Part 2) by hanana bt abdulla Posted: 10 Jan 2013 03:11 PM PST . . . Thanks to the 2 ‘mutts’ in the leadership of be end, mat madey and dolah-mat-layu the members of the umno party [mat dungus] and their apparatchiks who are mat-me-no-spik -and - no-write-inglis can allow this kind of mismangement to take place over a long period of time. . Only a body of mat-dungus in the party machine could have allowed madey and dolah to skim the country’s coffers with blatant disregard for accountablity or give value to the natiopn’s hard-earned wealth. To have allowed dolah to be sitting in MAS as advisor is to let a cat looking after the fish on the dinner table. This does not reflect well on be-end who is asking for an extension to rule the countyry. Only after that bee-end is replaced , can damages to all national asset be assessed. . . |
| Comment on DCA failed to withdraw the AOC of FAX / AirAsia X in 2007 (Part 2) by Jozan Posted: 10 Jan 2013 02:59 PM PST sini tipu lagi banyak, ayo ayo ayo mampuslah ini macam! |
| Comment on DCA failed to withdraw the AOC of FAX / AirAsia X in 2007 (Part 2) by Amir Posted: 10 Jan 2013 09:24 AM PST DCA, what have you got say about the report? To allow AirAsia X Sdn Bhd at that time to take over the AOC and then flying long haul routes was most shocking. |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Comments for Wee Choo Keong To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
Tiada ulasan:
Catat Ulasan