Comments for Wee Choo Keong |
- Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by Franky
- Comment on “IT PREYS ON UNREST” untuk “REGIME CHANGE”! by Average Joe
- Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by Hong Gee
- Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by The Gooberman
- Comment on “IT PREYS ON UNREST” untuk “REGIME CHANGE”! by Joshua
- Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by Average Joe
- Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by IT.Sheiss
- Comment on “IT PREYS ON UNREST” untuk “REGIME CHANGE”! by sharifah
- Comment on “IT PREYS ON UNREST” untuk “REGIME CHANGE”! by Prem
Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by Franky Posted: 25 Nov 2012 07:33 AM PST Now Everyone Can die Any Time!!! |
Comment on “IT PREYS ON UNREST” untuk “REGIME CHANGE”! by Average Joe Posted: 25 Nov 2012 07:28 AM PST Kenapa wakil PR beriya-iya hendak menghalang apabila ada Ahli Parlimen ingin berkongsi ilmu mendedahkan agenda campurtangan kuasa asing?! |
Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by Hong Gee Posted: 25 Nov 2012 05:57 AM PST As a reader has commented that safety cost money. If AirAsia is charging for everything including phone call for checking on refund, check in at the counter and etc, what do you expect. The pariah has said that “If you the price is low, Malaysians are prepared to risk their life.” This is the mentality of AirAsia. In view of the 6 months AOC granted, Malaysians must not take risk in booking AA tickets beyond February 2012 in order to play safe. In fact, I wouldn’t travel on AirAsia or any of its outfit because I do not want to risk my life. I would rather pay a bit more to fly MAS at least I know that I am safe. |
Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by The Gooberman Posted: 25 Nov 2012 05:41 AM PST Av Joe Aha, if only you knew….I have a couple of posts “awaiting moderation” by the blogmeister. I am not entirely convinced by a 6-month “stay of execution”. Why 6 months? Why not 3 months? Why not an immediate suspension of AirAsia’s AOC until the airline gets it’s act cleaned up? I mean, if the DCA wanted an example of how to do these things, it should have looked at what the Australian regulators did to Tiger Australia. All clear and transparent, with no ambivalence. So, is it politics or the DCA exercising it’s powers in a discreet and sensible manner? Your guess is as good as mine. |
Comment on “IT PREYS ON UNREST” untuk “REGIME CHANGE”! by Joshua Posted: 25 Nov 2012 01:49 AM PST Why should we bow down to foreign power and the like of George Sorros? Now certain undesirable element was call for Australian Government to intervene in our general elections. Australian government should intervene in the PKR party elections. |
Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by Average Joe Posted: 24 Nov 2012 09:36 PM PST One commentator nicknamed Gooberman has been deafeningly silent too. This chap will usually brag on everything if the article cover MH issues. |
Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by IT.Sheiss Posted: 24 Nov 2012 08:30 PM PST Now everybody can fly, now everybody can die! I always wondered whether these low-cost carriers cut corners in essential places to reduce cost and remain profitable and this episode seems answer YES. |
Comment on “IT PREYS ON UNREST” untuk “REGIME CHANGE”! by sharifah Posted: 24 Nov 2012 05:52 PM PST Salute to you YB! Salute! Always debating based on facts and for the interest of rakyat. Bless you! |
Comment on “IT PREYS ON UNREST” untuk “REGIME CHANGE”! by Prem Posted: 24 Nov 2012 07:56 AM PST Transparency and accountability only for others not PKR, DAP, PAS, Malaysiakini and other. That is their political belief. |
You are subscribed to email updates from Comments for Wee Choo Keong To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
Tiada ulasan:
Catat Ulasan