Comments for Wee Choo Keong |
- Comment on AirAsia’s X’mas Big Sale! by weechookeong
- Comment on AirAsia’s X’mas Big Sale! by KrystalClear
- Comment on AirAsia’s X’mas Big Sale! by Anonymous
- Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by Now Everybody Want To Pilot A380
- Comment on AirAsia’s X’mas Big Sale! by Nujum Pak Belalang
- Comment on AJ & Zahrah Zaid brought back the A380! by usjT
- Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by abeeonawindow
- Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by abeeonawindow
- Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by abeeonawindow
- Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by abeeonawindow
Comment on AirAsia’s X’mas Big Sale! by weechookeong Posted: 15 Dec 2012 08:08 AM PST Anonymous 11:54 pm As far as I know Expedia itself has no license. It was using the license of AirAsia Go Holiday Sdn Bhd. Regards Wee choo Keong |
Comment on AirAsia’s X’mas Big Sale! by KrystalClear Posted: 15 Dec 2012 08:04 AM PST Out of curiosity I flew with AA from Kota Kinabalu to LCCT Sepang just one way and came back using MAS. That was the first and last time I’d fly with the crappy airline. The difference in fares with MAS was not that much but AA service was atrocious. |
Comment on AirAsia’s X’mas Big Sale! by Anonymous Posted: 15 Dec 2012 07:54 AM PST alooo yb…what happen to xpedia….wa..have license or not…why everbody are keep quiet…. |
Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by Now Everybody Want To Pilot A380 Posted: 15 Dec 2012 07:53 AM PST Even if “Captain Sumali” was not correctly spelled, it makes no different. The fact is that he is a DCA officer. His job is to do safety audit on AA and other non-IATA airlines. What was he doing when he was exposed to have piloted the A380. Of course, we are appreciative of him uncovering the discrepancies after so many years! No wonder DCA was asleep all these years because you have officer like him who was more interested in piloting a plane or taking a joy ride than carrying their duties as DCA officer. |
Comment on AirAsia’s X’mas Big Sale! by Nujum Pak Belalang Posted: 15 Dec 2012 06:20 AM PST If you all happen to meet TF and a cobra at the same time, you know what to do, dont you?.. Only then NOW EVERYONE CAN FLY SAFELY. |
Comment on AJ & Zahrah Zaid brought back the A380! by usjT Posted: 14 Dec 2012 11:49 PM PST Such a large entourage of 80, to do what? Does MAS know what they are doing? Isn’t it any wonder why MAS is high in it’s expenditure, and making losses, spending and paying unnecessarily? How to make money when such simple maths does not seem to make any sense to the top management and board of directors of MAS. Truly “Mana Ada Sense”. |
Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by abeeonawindow Posted: 14 Dec 2012 04:24 PM PST I’ll spare you all looking… (from http://www.casa.gov.au) CASA's primary function under the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) is to conduct the safety regulation of civil air operations in Australian territory and the operation of Australian aircraft outside Australian territory, by means that include ‘developing effective enforcement strategies to secure compliance with aviation safety standards’. CASA takes enforcement action when it detects non-compliance with obligations imposed by the Act, the Civil Aviation Regulations and the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations, other instruments made under the Act or the Regulations and relevant parts of the Criminal Code. Non-compliance in this context may involve contravention of the Act or the Regulations, but it may also involve a breach of a condition attaching to a licence or certificate, or acts or omissions which indicate that a person no longer meets the standards required by the legislation for the holding of a licence or certificate. CASA has a range of enforcement options and takes an holistic approach to safety enforcement by utilising the most appropriate enforcement remedy or remedies given the facts of the particular breach and its safety implications. These enforcement options are exercised in accordance with the procedures set out in the Enforcement Manual. More interesting if you read this: http://www.atsb.gov.au/media/3543830/ao2010027.doc |
Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by abeeonawindow Posted: 14 Dec 2012 03:41 PM PST Ummm, whatever some of you guys personally think or feel about “Captain Sumali” (that’s not even the correct spelling), know these points… He was the one conducting the DCA audit of AA. He was the one “uncovering the discrepancies” (probably knew already but so it goes…). DFO went out of his way to pi$$ Sumar off and he issued the limited AOC (obviously after consultation with the powers in Putrajaya). Bear in mind he is #2 in DCA and will be the Director General most likely in 2013. |
Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by abeeonawindow Posted: 14 Dec 2012 03:28 PM PST And Mo, your heart’s in the right place bro, but mind who you accuse of poor English when yours is a little off the mark. Emotion is getting the better of your argument. |
Comment on AirAsia did not meet regulatory standard? by abeeonawindow Posted: 14 Dec 2012 03:23 PM PST Guys, guys, guys… cool it. Adun is partly correct even if he/she didn’t word it nicely. The Aussie authorities probably wouldn’t be laughing (well they might have a chuckle) but if you haven’t found out already they’ll most likely say “we can’t really help you, but you could try forwarding your grievances to … “. CASA will love you if you give them something juicy on AirAsiaX but end of the day they can only act upon what is legally provable and enforceable. Giving them a heap of trash on AirAsia does not permit them to “take it out” on AirAsiaX (no matter how much they might like to). What you are asking/hoping of CASA to do is akin to your condemnation of DCA here. C’mon lah bro, be rational. And FYI, when Tiger was fully grounded in Australia they continued to sell tickets for flights in advance of the present date… how? Because the “promise” of travel to which your ticket is proof is only broken when the purchased flight fails to commence. If Tiger knew they would never fly again then there is a case, but if they honestly believe they will be able to fly in the not-too-distant-future they can still make those “promises”. Of course they must abide by the rules of breaking that promise to the consumer should it occur in any event, but you know what… they got your money already. Even if they have to give it back to you at some point they have it right now and it becomes part of their operating revenue. How on earth do you think AA survives from day to day in the present, largely in part due to forward sales. This is how all LCCs operate. It’s the airline equivalent of buying property development off-plan/pre-construction. Normal airlines wait months to get the revenue from non-internet ticket sales (goes through IATA clearing accounts) sometimes even after you have travelled. That’s why Fernandes hates IATA and AA for a long time wasn’t a member. But I digress. |
You are subscribed to email updates from Comments for Wee Choo Keong To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
Tiada ulasan:
Catat Ulasan