念群与沙登人民同在 | Nie Ching for Serdang |
- 【念念有辞】我被首相Spammed了!
- 【星洲日报】皇委会查明福死因 ‧ 疑隱瞒曾纂改调查日记‧官员阿曼或被控
- [TBH@Royal Commision] Did MACC officer 'tamper' with investigation diaries?
- 【南洋商报@3月11日】推特精选摘要
Posted: 14 Mar 2011 07:52 AM PDT My column in China Press tonight.. How I wish Maxis, Digi and Celcom could send out free sms on behalf of Federal Government to explain if we are facing any danger after the nuclear power plant explosion in Japan.. Corporate social responsibility is to make Malaysia a better place, not to make Najib looks better. Article published on the Website of Chinese newspaper Chinapress.com.my 行动党两代小辣椒心有灵犀,在新一季国会的第二天不约而同的追问首相新春贺语的费用和途径! 新春前夕,突然收到来自首相一家的贺岁简讯。在面子书和推特上晃晃,才知道原来我不是被首相特别眷顾,许多人都收到了相同的简讯,有些还收到了来自首相的电邮。心里不由泛起了嘀咕,究竟首相大人是怎么知道大家的手机号码和电邮地址呢? 国会复会后,才知道师姐冯宝君也同样心存纳闷。想必还有许许多多的大马人也和我们一样好奇。 就在上星期二,答案正式揭晓。原来这个新年期间,首相通过本地的3家通讯公司,即Digi.Com、明讯(Maxis Berhad)和天地通(Celcom Berhad)发送短讯给400万名大马人。与此同时,首相也通过首要媒体有限公司(Media Prima Berhad)、高等教育部以及首相个人网址www.1malaysia.com.my三个管道收集邮址,以每封5分的费用发送了125万5528封首相个人贺词电邮。 (More......) |
【星洲日报】皇委会查明福死因 ‧ 疑隱瞒曾纂改调查日记‧官员阿曼或被控 Posted: 14 Mar 2011 07:34 AM PDT For blog post written in English, please click here. 对於阿曼拥有两个不同版本的调查日记,冯正仁諭令前者把手提电脑和手机交由施国伟查办。 (吉隆坡14日讯)疑篡改本身调查日记,反贪委会官员阿曼或將面对被控的危机! 因不满阿曼可以隱瞒曾纂改调查日记,大马律师公会今日向皇委会建议把阿曼交由独立调查员施国伟查办,以採取进一步的法律行动。云大舜建议,皇委会可针对阿曼是否蓄意纂改调查日记一事,要求施国伟作深入调查,因为纂改法庭文件或官方文件可构成刑事罪。 皇委会委员西尔温迪拉纳登则表示,阿曼已改口称撰写第二份日记是作为自己的后备记录,而非提呈皇委会为证物;不过,云大舜则指出,这么做是为了避免未来有同样的事情发生。 另一方面,皇委会主席丹斯里冯正仁在休庭与其他委员商议后说,皇委会已一致通过要阿曼把手提电脑和手机交由施国伟作进一步调查。他说,除了手提电脑和手机外,阿曼必须把手机电讯公司资料提呈予施国伟,以擷取出案发当时的一切相关资料。 不过,除了阿曼外,冯正仁表示,只有在有必要的情况下,皇委会才会充公其他反贪委会官员的手提电脑和手机。 转载自《星洲日报》 【当今大马】首份调查日记染电脑病毒遗失 官员被疑窜改伪造第二份日记~ 高嘉琪 布城反贪会官员阿曼除了提供三份不同版本的供词之外,他针对赵明福所做出的两份调查日记(Investigation Diary)的内容也被踢爆有出入,他在7个月前重写的第二份调查日记更特地注明“没向赵明福暴力迫供”,疑惑重重。律师公会代表律师云大舜今日向皇委会 申请,让私家侦探盘问阿曼是否涉嫌窜改及伪造其调查日记。 (More......) |
[TBH@Royal Commision] Did MACC officer 'tamper' with investigation diaries? Posted: 14 Mar 2011 07:29 AM PDT ~S Pathmawathy There are inconsistencies in the investigation diaries of a Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) investigator, the royal commission of inquiry investigating the death of Teoh Beng Hock was told. Bar Council lawyer Edmund Bon (left), who questioned MACC assistant enforcement officer Arman Alies, suggested that the discrepancies revealed pertaining to the diaries today “could be tantamount to tampering with official documents”. Arman said he had prepared two investigation diaries on his interview with Teoh, held on July 15, 2009, the day before the latter was found dead. Teoh, political aide to DAP's Seri Kembangan assemblyperson Ean Yong Hian Wah, was interrogated as a witness by the Selangor MACC about alleged misuse of state funds by his employer. Arman, the enforcement officer who took down Teoh's testimony, said he had only filed his investigation notes on that interview about three days after it took place. "The police had taken my statement (on Teoh's death) and only after that did I write my diary about the conversations with him. (I recorded it) either during the night of July 18 or on the morning of the 19th,” said Arman. The second investigation diary, meanwhile, was typed more than a year after the interview with Teoh, and was a far “more detailed diary with specifications”, the inquiry was informed. It is required of MACC enforcement officers to file investigation diaries in order to keep track of their progress in a case. This prompted Bon to ask Arman whether he still kept the soft copy of the first investigation diary he had compiled. (More......) |
Posted: 13 Mar 2011 08:15 AM PDT |
You are subscribed to email updates from 念群与沙登人民同在 | Nie Ching for Serdang To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
Tiada ulasan:
Catat Ulasan