Ahad, 17 Februari 2013

Comments for Wee Choo Keong

Comments for Wee Choo Keong

Comment on Azahari Dahlan: Was SRT’s statement referring to a possible joint venture with MAS? by Kaladin

Posted: 17 Feb 2013 06:07 AM PST

Spot on, Gooberman.

Let’s not forget how the IPPs were brought in to compete with Tenaga Nasional.

When did that happen and on whose watch?

What’s the difference between Tenaga Nasional and the IPPs on the one hand and MAS and AirAsia on the other hand?

Isn’t it all about competition?

And the Darwinian law of the free market where inefficient companies get weeded out and culled?

Who remembers Burroughs, ICL and Sperry Univac now? Or BOAC or Pan American World Air?

Incidentally, I note that no one, as yet, has replied to the points raised by “le batard” in the posting on Feb 3, 2013 at 3:37 pm.

Now, why do you suppose that is?

Comment on Azahari Dahlan: Was SRT’s statement referring to a possible joint venture with MAS? by MAS AVENGERS

Posted: 16 Feb 2013 10:47 PM PST

MASEU said
"This is not the way to revitalise MAS. We should straighten out our own affairs starting with the decision makers"

Tan Sri Abdul Aziz said
"Firstly, it was due to lack of good management over the past 15 years and secondly, it may be caused by the government's failure to have an orderly air transport policy."

Tun Tony said
"MAS is a good airline. There's no cost problems in MAS. The problem is revenue"

Now, who is the "clever people who cannot understand simple arithmetic."

Gooberman, all the answers to your dumb questions are mentioned below (if only you know how to read).
https://weechookeong.wordpress.com/2011/09/25/tan-sri-nor-yacob-azman-mokhtar-wake-up-learn-from-tan-sri-abdul-aziz/

Comment on Azahari Dahlan: Was SRT’s statement referring to a possible joint venture with MAS? by Kaladin

Posted: 16 Feb 2013 04:45 PM PST

Mr Isa

I await your response to my posting on Feb 3, 2013 at 10:00 pm.

Also, if you can, please respond to my posting of Feb 5, 2013 at 7:26 pm.

And while you are about it, let’s debate about the history of MAS after the break up of MSA (Malaysia-Singapore Airlines).

Which was when, pray tell?

Comment on Dr Don: MAS-AIRASIA share swap is a “NATIONAL TRAGEDY!” by kgbaru

Posted: 16 Feb 2013 08:44 AM PST

not a bad blog. good discussions. why no more updates.

Comment on Azahari Dahlan: Was SRT’s statement referring to a possible joint venture with MAS? by The Gooberman

Posted: 16 Feb 2013 05:01 AM PST

Mr Isa

I don’t need to consult anybody to understand the economic absurdities that you are trying to peddle.

I am glad that you have stated that it’s the duty of the government to “subsidise unprofitable domestic routes and the RAS”. This is an absurd argument as it mandates the government to use public funds to subsidise those who want to fly domestic air routes and the rural routes in East Malaysia.

Why stop there? Why not subsidise long-haul express bus fares in the country?

It’s the “freebie entitlement” mentality writ large, with all the profligacy it implies.

As for MAS, how many years was it in existence before AirAsia was set up? For how many of these pre-AirAsia years was MAS profitable? How many “bailouts” did MAS go through?

Another question: wasn’t AirAsia’s licence approved during the administration of Dr Mahathir? Why isn’t Dr M being castigated and excoriated for allowing AirAsia to be set up, when common sense would indicate up that it would compete with MAS?

Just answer these questions, if you can.

I have more to come…..
Dicatat oleh di

Tiada ulasan:

Catat Ulasan

Langgan: Catat Ulasan (Atom)

Nuffnang